Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (March 2008, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:03:49 -0700
Reply-To:     Jake de Villiers <crescentbeachguitar@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Jake de Villiers <crescentbeachguitar@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: body work vs. mechanical work
Comments: To: Kenneth Wilford <kenwilfy@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To:  <47D5AE35.7060609@comcast.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Andrew, you might want to do a Search for Rob Becida's Subaru Conversion posts. You too Ken.

He installed a 2.2 for less than $2500, including the sheet of plywood he did the wiring harness on!

On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Kenneth Wilford <kenwilfy@comcast.net> wrote:

> Andrew, > I have never heard of anyone doing a conversion for less than just > replacing the waterboxer with a rebuilt one. I know there have been > many people who thought they were going to get by cheaper but after all > was said and done it is always more expensive. And it only makes sense > that it is. If you replace the waterboxer with a rebuilt one there may > be many parts (exhaust, coolant system, etc.) that you may be able to > reuse. If you are putting a subaru in you are looking at a new exhaust > system, new coolant system, new clutch, etc. It is just the name of the > game. A nice, low mileage subaru engine is not something that you can > find under any rock. If you do find one, usually people will want some > money for it. > > My point is if you want to go the cheapest route go with stock. If you > want to do a Subaru conversion then do that but don't expect it to be > cheaper. > > Ken Wilford > John 3:16 > www.vanagain.com > > Richards, Andrew wrote: > > My vanagon is nearing a crossroads in its life. With 160K on the > > original engine and transmission, I'm starting to think hard about its > > future. Its body is pretty darn straight, but seam rust is creeping > > along and a body shop just quoted me $1500 to fix all the rust > > (windshield too) and parking lot dents. > > > > > > > > What should come first? Body or mechanical issues? I've always > > understood it's best to attack rust ASAP because it'll only get more > > expensive to fix. On the other hand, dropping a large chunk of $$$ into > > body work on a van who's guts are getting on in years may be futile for > > a guy who's pockets aren't that deep. What would you do? I'm also > > considering a do-it-yourself Subaru conversion, which could save me 1-2K > > compared to a pro WBX rebuild. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Andrew > > > > '87 GL > > > > Portland, OR > > > > >

-- Jake 1984 Vanagon GL 1986 Westy Weekender "Dixie" Crescent Beach, BC www.crescentbeachguitar.com http://subyjake.googlepages.com/mydixiedarlin%27


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.