Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (March 2008, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:32:15 EDT
Reply-To:     Cotsford@AOL.COM
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Steve Cotsford <Cotsford@AOL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Fuel Milage
Comments: To: groundhogging@mac.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

Properly set up, they will all be about the same. It takes ex amount of horsepower to move a given weight at a given speed. It will take roughly the same amount of fuel if there are more locos used. The locos have to work less hard for a given load if there are more of them so they burn less fuel each. By adding another locomotive you are adding another 180 tons to the train weight but you can go up steeper grades. The locos are coupled electrically to share the load and depending just how well they are coupled the efficiency can vary. Sometimes the locos are deadheading in a train. An empty coal train going west from the Great Lakes to the Powder River Basin may only have 1 loco doing the lions share. On the way back, loaded, it will probably take all the locos working hard on the up grades.

CSX dont tell you that a loco just idling, going nowhere at all, might burn 200 gallons of diesel in a day. Thank fully the modern locos burn much less.

In a message dated 3/13/2008 12:04:03 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, groundhogging@mac.com writes:

So if you have a multiple engined train- say with 300 cars, is the individual fuel consumption of the engines higher or lower?

On Mar 12, 2008, at 11:50 PM, Steve Cotsford wrote:

That ad is misleading. Diesel locomotives burn lots of fuel. Its just that they can pull lots of tons too. The rolling resistance of a train can be as low as 10 lbs per ton, about 1/5th of a road going truck. A loaded freight car weighs about 130 tons and a train can be 100 cars long. That adds up to 13000 tons. CSX says it can carry 1 ton 432 miles on 1 gallon of diesel fuel. If that train goes 432 miles, it uses 13000 gallons.

Steve

In a message dated 3/12/2008 11:14:41 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, _inua@CHARTER.NET_ (mailto:inua@CHARTER.NET) writes:

Duh! Am I dumb - I didn't get it. CSX Railroad has an advertisement going right now touting 432 mile per gallons. It the autmobile being carried 432 miles that makes the mileage.

John Rodgers 88 GL Driver

John Rodgers wrote:

Here's a question ............. what current multiwheel (greater than two) vehuckes gets 432 miles to the gallon???

Yes - it's for real!

John Rodgers

**************It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms, and advice on AOL Money & Finance. (_http://money.aol.com/tax?NCID=aolprf00030000000001_ (http://money.aol.com/tax?NCID=aolprf00030000000001) )

Oliver Mueller-Heubach _groundhogging@mac.com_ (mailto:groundhogging@mac.com)

=

**************It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms, and advice on AOL Money & Finance. (http://money.aol.com/tax?NCID=aolprf00030000000001)


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.