Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (March 2008, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sat, 15 Mar 2008 11:38:33 -0800
Reply-To:     neil N <musomuso@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         neil N <musomuso@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Building carrier (load bar) Square or rectangular tube steel?
Comments: To: John Rodgers <inua@charter.net>
In-Reply-To:  <47DC21ED.708@charter.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

See. This is what I mean by "more educated minds". And for sure opinions and thoughts from others with more or different experience.

Doing an engine conversion like this (yes I was warned!) encompasses quite a few areas of knowledge. And is pushing me to learn more which is great. Unfortunately, some areas I lack a total background in. Uh, like I failed Physics 11. And Algebra 11. And when I requested to take welding class, my HS councillor told me to try Algebra again. ?? Yeesh! --- ;^)

Going by pics of someones elses design to make the carrier is a challenge in that I want to do it as "right" as I can. No negative reflection on the original designer. I like the way the design looks and he has been helpful. Still a challenge, though pics REALLY help.

I would have been in the dark with wet matches had I not seen them.

I'm sure mild steel will do the job. This carrier will likely be over-built when I'm done with it.

Extra weight and material costs be damned! --- :^)

Neil.

On 3/15/08, John Rodgers <inua@charter.net> wrote: > My experience with the tube strength issues comes mostly form my work > years ago with welding on small aircraft airframes. Most that I worked > with were constructed of round tubular steel. It has been a long time, > but I seem to remember that most were made of 4130 chromaloy steel., a > very strong, tough metal. Welded up properly a section made of this was > practically indestructible in compression loads. But bending loads were > another matter, and that applies to most any round tube. Square or > rectangular had limited application. They were used, but not for full > frame construction. Those kinds of tubes has special applications. > > John Rodgers > 88 GL Driver > neil N wrote: > > Thanks John. > > > > This is also what the metal guy expressed, so I was curious to "hear" > > what more educated minds had to say. FWIW, the stock air cooled (and > > WBX I think) is very much a rectangular shape. From memory, looks like > > 1" by .5" Obviously designed to handle L to R movement. > > > > I have some scraps of hot rolled 2"x2" and plate steel (that the metal > > guy kindly gave me) that I can try my hand at for practice fitting and > > welding. I will play with wood scraps to find my angles first. It > > looks like it's all 45's with the exception of the 90 needed to hang > > from the subframe. > > > > Once I get the engine at the right "height", and make some test pieces > > out of wood, I should be able to determine how long the long side of > > the rectangle can be before the bottom of the carrier hangs too low > > below oil pan. > > > > (he says thinking outloud to no one in particular --- ;^) > > > > Neil. > > > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 10:35 AM, John Rodgers <inua@charter.net> wrote: > > > >> Neil, > >> > >> I'm not an engineer, but I would think that a tube with rectangular > >> crossection would have the greater strength, depending on the directions > >> loads are applied. Just my opinion. > >> > >> John Rodgers > >> 88 GL Driver > >> Chelsea, AL - where it's thundering, lightening, and pouring down rain. > >> Ahhh! Spring showers! > >> > >> > >> > >> neil N wrote: > >> > Hi all. > >> > > >> > I am ready to fabricate the engine carrier for my 15 degree Jetta > conversion. > >> > > >> > Is 1/8" - 2"x2" hot rolled tube rigid enough? > >> > > >> > Or should I use rectangular tube? ( 2"x 2.2.5" ? 2" x 2.5" ?) > >> > > >> > Will the rectangular shape add strength/stability ? > >> > > >> > For sure 2" is needed for base of Fox mounts I'm using. > >> > > >> > > >> > TIA, > >> > > >> > Neil. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Neil Nicholson. 1981 Air Cooled Westfalia - "Jaco" > >> > > >> > http://web.mac.com/tubaneil > >> > http://tubaneil.googlepages.com/ > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Neil Nicholson. 1981 Air Cooled Westfalia - "Jaco" > > > > http://web.mac.com/tubaneil > > http://tubaneil.googlepages.com/ > > > > > > > > > -- Neil Nicholson. 1981 Air Cooled Westfalia - "Jaco" http://web.mac.com/tubaneil http://tubaneil.googlepages.com/


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.