Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (March 2008, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 27 Mar 2008 21:50:02 -0400
Reply-To:     Dennis Haynes <d23haynes57@HOTMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
Comments:     RFC822 error: <W> MESSAGE-ID field duplicated. Last occurrence
              was retained.
From:         Dennis Haynes <d23haynes57@HOTMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: this has me rethinking dexcool
Comments: To: Angus Gordon <birdworks@GMAIL.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <2163811a0803261759o75e7e34fn5434ab19fcc54312@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

You really have to chuckle. GM writes the spec and approves the fluid and there is suit against the chemical company? Many of those failures were not just bad gaskets. The composite manifolds also liked to warp and crack. As for coolant going though the intake manifold, almost all V shaped engines do this. How do you think the coolant gets to that thermostat housing in the middle? Remember manifold heat riser valves? Just in case coolant wasn't enough to heat the manifold and carburetor, let's close of the exhaust manifold on one side so the gasses would go through the manifold, under the carb for fast heating. Oh, let's also vent some exhaust to the choke stove so it knows when to open. The early VW Rabbit motors had water hoses going into the manifold for carb heat and even into the chokes to control them. Water every where!

While it sucks when gaskets fail, what really becomes an issue is that unexplained fluid losses don’t get fixed. I wonder how many engines got destroyed from this manifold or gasket failure and how many could have been avoided. I know every one I saw gave plenty of warning signs before that eventual cloud of smoke and the holy pistons that became the result.

Dennis

-----Original Message----- From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of Angus Gordon Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 8:59 PM To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: Re: this has me rethinking dexcool

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 8:55 AM, gary hradek <hradek@yahoo.com> wrote:

> http://www.girardgibbs.com/dexcool.html >

Don't forget this is lawyer talk, not a technical paper of any sort. GM had a problem with coolant leakage through the intake manifold on these engines, and I'm guessing the lawyers probably sued the makers of Dex-cool, GM, the gasket manufacturer and the Detroit water department. The shotgun approach to litigation seems quite lucrative.

I have a friend with a Buick Century which had this problem a few years back. I checked it over for him after it had overheated and found coolant in the engine oil. Some research on the internet revealed the most likely cause was this coolant leak through the intake manifold. GM had a new, re-designed gasket available so I, unsuspecting, offered to change it for him. I mean, how much work is an intake manifold gasket? Ten hours later I knew!

GM in their infinite wisdom runs coolant from one head bank to the other through the intake, which sits down in the V between the heads. Makes the waterboxer design with all it's external plumbing look like the work of a genius. I think the problem is with the design and gasket material, not the coolant. The "rusty sludge" they talk about in the lawsuit is no doubt the result of coolant left unchanged since the vehicle was new.

Vanagon content - since working on this Buick I have never again cursed the myriad of external pipes and hoses VW adorned the Vanagon with. Even the waterboxer head gaskets are a brilliant design in comparison!

-- Angus Gordon birdworks@gmail.com


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.