Date:         Mon, 14 Apr 2008 09:53:56 -0400
Reply-To:     craig cowan <phishman068@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         craig cowan <phishman068@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: less than one?
Comments: To: Maggie Dew <wildebus@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:  <4387de760804140626s3347c627jd70533396c570f99@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I personally think having one or more, or wanting one (or more) is one
thing, but i see the wierdest of the wierd and the most passionate of the
passionate, to be those with "MOST OF ONE".
I think many of us have been here.....owning "MOST OF ONE" (Something
crucial missing at the time).

Try explaining that one to people!
"Oh you have a Vanagon!?"
"Well...... Yes, technically. It needs an engine, transmission, etc etc etc,
but yes, i have one, and i love it"
"Oh...." (Eyes roll and they walk away)

-Craig
'85GL (Well, most of one.)

On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Maggie Dew <wildebus@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hmm . . . I was going to say one is enough, but maybe even thinking of
> buying one, lusting after one, plotting how to get one - all would qualify
> you.
>
> Maggie
>
> >I just bought a second Vanagon. How many before I'm officially
> > considered a "Vanagon Weirdo"?
> >
> > --
> > John Bange
> > '90 Vanagon - "Geldsauger"
> > '90 Vanagon GL- "Weasel"
>