Those two things aren't mutually exclusive, in fact they are so close in polar original that it can confidently be stated that you merely need to pick your poison so-to-speak between the two. The years and development dollars were not all in vain or misdirected, but now, they must simply be re-directed. I think the biggest complaint that could be made is on general complacency in technological development and lost opportunities/time vs profit taking. Of course that is fueled by it's environment right? Which then keeps bouncing down the causal drain until I give up, decide to ignore it, and do my best. Jim Akiba On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 3:52 PM, BJ Feddish <bfeddish@netreach.net> wrote: If they had used the technology over the last 25 years to improve > mileage instead of performance we'd be in a better place. |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.