Date:         Wed, 23 Apr 2008 23:45:05 -0400
Reply-To:     Jim Akiba <syncrolist@BOSTIG.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Jim Akiba <syncrolist@BOSTIG.COM>
Subject:      Re: Gas, milage, etc (was Air Engine)
Comments: To: BJ Feddish <bfeddish@netreach.net>
In-Reply-To:  <0af601c8a57b$a4fa80e0$0401a8c0@cspfr2>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Those two things aren't mutually exclusive, in fact they are so close
in polar original that it can confidently be stated that you merely
need to pick your poison so-to-speak between the two. The years and
development dollars were not all in vain or misdirected, but now, they
must simply be re-directed. I think the biggest complaint that could
be made is on general complacency in technological development and
lost opportunities/time vs profit taking. Of course that is fueled by
it's environment right? Which then keeps bouncing down the causal
drain until I give up,  decide to ignore it, and do my best.

Jim Akiba

On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 3:52 PM, BJ Feddish <bfeddish@netreach.net> wrote:
 If they had used the technology over the last 25 years to improve
>  mileage instead of performance we'd be in a better place.