Date:         Tue, 6 May 2008 16:22:09 -0700
Reply-To:     obeechi@RUNBOX.COM
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Mark C <obeechi@RUNBOX.COM>
Subject:      Re: Solar Panel: Charge Controller & Vents
Comments: To: colorworks@GCI.NET
In-Reply-To:  <001501c8afb7$d7865480$0201a8c0@troykv7nw3q4te>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Okay then, so which batteries do you guys think is best?

From: Troy <colorworks@GCI.NET>
To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
Subject: Solar Panel: Charge Controller & Vents

> Excellent advice from Dennis. I can say firsthand that the Odyssey batteries are not all they're cracked up to be. I've been having a lot of trouble with mine recently keeping it charged. It seems to take a sustained high amps before it will start to accept it charge. If it drops below a certain point, my standard alternator will not charge it. I then have to remove my front seat to allow me to get the chargers leads in there, and then run the charger on manual for about four hours. A royal PITA. One nice thing, is they can be deeply discharged and still be recovered. A standard battery would be toast under similar circumstances. I paid a whopping $175 for mine. Not sure what else fits behind the seat though.
> 
> Troy
> 
> 
> <<Seems like an awful lot of money to accomplish what? Never mind carrying
> around 300 pounds of battery. The best part of the Odyssey batteries is the
> advertisements. You would be much better off in the long run with good
> flooded batteries. They are charge and temparature sensitve and have high
> failure rates. Check the current warranty.
> 

----- End Original Message -----