Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 09:06:00 -0700
Reply-To: neil N <musomuso@GMAIL.COM>
Sender: Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From: neil N <musomuso@GMAIL.COM>
Subject: Re: I'm thinking about going to gas
In-Reply-To: <695982.5737.qm@web33507.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
I look forward to actually driving my ABA conversion!
From what I've read, the bottom end on the 2.0 is a lot tougher than
the 1.8's One big reason modders use it with the 1.8 head.
And FWIW, I'm pretty sure that not every 2.0 c/w oil squirters.
Something Chris would want if he went this route. And, IIRC, engines
from model years '93-95' were most likely to c/w these squirters. Plus
they had stronger cranks, and are OBD1. Much more user friendly to
install as opposed to OBD2.
Neil.
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 8:02 PM, Robert Keezer <warmerwagen@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Well, if the 82 conversion Westy is any good for the price, that will save you a lot of work.
> But then if you don't mind work and saving yourself the 3 K, get a 2 liter ABA to replace your Diesel engine. These can be had cheap and the 2 liter has more power, torque, and will last longer than the 1.8.
>
> The 2 liter (93-99 Golf Jetta) has a crossflow head but you can use a 1.8 head on it . I have for 8 years and no problems, engine now has over 230,000. Still runs good after 8 years but uses oil , but then I towed Vanagons a couple thousand miles with my Westy.
> Still, I am amazed this engine is so tough.
>
> I went thru 2 1.8's within 4 years .
>
> Robert
> 1982 Westfalia
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- On Sat, 6/14/08, chris jackson <chriscjack@BIGPLANET.COM> wrote:
>
> From: chris jackson <chriscjack@BIGPLANET.COM>
> Subject: I'm thinking about going to gas
> To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
> Date: Saturday, June 14, 2008, 6:53 PM
>
> My 82 westy d is dead low compression. I have found an 82 westy that has a 1.8
> gas & rebuilt trans for $3k. I will take a look at it tomorrow see how it
> drives. I have been looking for a replacement for the 1.6 NA but the cost &
> really it needs the 1.9t + cost of installation is going run me over $4k. Also
> with the cost of diesel the few more miles per gal makes not to seem cost
> affective at this point. But I'm in CA & hope DMV don't not want to
> see the bus if so that's not going to work.
>
> Any feed back from you all.
>
> Chris
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> __._,_.___
> Messages in this topic (1) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic
> Messages | Files | Photos | Links | Database | Polls | Members | Calendar
> MARKETPLACE
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> You rock! Blockbuster wants to give you a complimentary trial of - Blockbuster
> Total Access.
>
> Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
> Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to
> Traditional
> Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe Recent Activity
> a.. 1New Members
> Visit Your Group
> Y! Sports for TV
> Access it for free
>
> Get Fantasy Sports
>
> stats on your TV.
>
> Yahoo! Finance
> It's Now Personal
>
> Guides, news,
>
> advice & more.
>
> Food Lovers
> Real Food Group
>
> on Yahoo! Groups
>
> find out more.
> .
> __,_._,___
>
--
Neil Nicholson '81 JettaWesty "Jaco
http://groups.google.com/group/vanagons-with-vw-inline-4-cylinder-gas-engines
http://web.mac.com/tubaneil
http://tubaneil.googlepages.com/
| 
