Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (June 2008, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sat, 21 Jun 2008 08:18:27 -0700
Reply-To:     Neil2 <vidublu@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Neil2 <vidublu@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Drafting for better MPG
Comments: To: dylan friedman <insyncro@yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To:  <810048.53014.qm@web52102.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I believe he was saying a length for every 10 mph of speed which, I believe, is legal, in optimum conditions.

That dirty air is one reason I stopped drafting. Too close and it's dangerous, too far and it's useless, to me.

On 6/21/08, dylan friedman <insyncro@yahoo.com> wrote: > > sorry, one car length is in the trucks "dirty air" and not helping you. > You would have to be inside the envelope of his draft to gain any benefit. > I don't believe that your trip computer had enough time to even computer a > true estimate of savings. > Also, a V70XC does not have anywhere near the drag of a Vanagon. > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Jack R. <jack007@COMCAST.NET> > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2008 8:42:53 AM > Subject: Re: Drafting for better MPG > > OK... I get it! However, even in keeping 1 car/van length for each > 10mph... > I get at least a 10% improvement behind a good long and tall semi. I can > see his mirrors, so he can see me! Again, this was tested with an instant > MPG readout on my Volvo V70XC. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of > Mike > Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2008 8:26 AM > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: Re: Drafting for better MPG > > It's not the stopping distance that's a problem in causing a tailgater > rear-end collision. It's reaction time, and lack of being able to > anticipate a sudden issue. That's why tail-gating is illegal, even if you > attempt to explain to the officer (and the judge) that you were just > 'NASCAR > drafting' in an ill-concieved attempt to improve gas mileage. > Plus, if the tractor-trailer hits an immoveable object (like a bridge > abutment, or a large vehicle pulling out in front of it, normal braking > stopping distances are irrelevant. > Come on, people! Where's the common sense in all this? An intelligent > person wouldn't dream of partaking in such a risky and stupid act. You > have > too much to lose. > > Mike B. > > > 3.) If you are paying attention, you will not end up as a rear bumper > > ornament on a semi. Stopping distance for a 40,000 lb truck is a bit > > longer than a 4,000 lb van. >

-- Neil2 '82 Diesel Westy (Duckie)


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.