Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (June 2008, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:36:34 +1200
Reply-To:     Andrew Grebneff <andrew.grebneff@STONEBOW.OTAGO.AC.NZ>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Andrew Grebneff <andrew.grebneff@STONEBOW.OTAGO.AC.NZ>
Subject:      Re: photo... illiteracy: examples from replies
In-Reply-To:  <061320081445.20317.485287FF0008478C00004F5D2214756402C9C9CDCB020E03020100@comcast.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I'm impressed that, having read several replies to my posting, none have shown selfrighteous indignation. The subject is entirely relevant to the list.

In my experience even dedicated scientists have problems with punctuation and spelling.

> Waht is the big dael aobut snplleig on the Vgoaann lsit? The hamun mnid > can furige out prttey mcuh any wrod as lnog as the wreitr dseon't > srecw up the fsrit and lsat crcteraahs.

Words can indeed be worked out from context, but often punctuation cannot. These things are NOT unimportant... our entire written language depends on them, and one incorrect punctuation-mark can utterly change the meaning of a sentence eg "What's that on the road ahead?" and "What's that on the road, ahead?" (and at this point addition of a period to end my sentence is problematic... triple punctuation, anyone?

Note that dictionaries ans spellcheckers are only as good as their authors!

Of course typos don't count, but:

> Uhhh, you'd be amazed at how many CEO's...(70's)...

Er... what do the CEOs and the 70 own?

> Its not just spelling Jeff, but the complete lack of structure in > peoples' > emails.

It's not just spelling, Jeff, but the...

> Yeah well I said "important letters, etc."

Yeah, well, I said "important letters etc".

> I agree it's spelling, grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure. > However, we also have to consider each of us has our own strengths.

I agree that it's spelling, grammar, punctuation and sentence structure. However we also have to consider that each of us...

> Maybe you should find someone else for that task. (e-mail., writtne, > submited).

.. someone else for that task (e-mail, written, sumitted).

> ...and some of it's wiring chewed on by animals...

its. It's means "it is".

> Pricey.

ALWAYS remove a final e from a word before adding any suffix. If "torquy" looks awkward, so what?

> An evolving language is the equivalent of grammar by the lowest common > denominator, no? And think I actually had to learn English as a > second > language the correct way. What was I thinking!

Well said! Languages do of course evolve; however corruption is something else entirely.


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.