Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (June 2008, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 19 Jun 2008 00:03:24 -0700
Reply-To:     Keith Hughes <keithahughes@QWEST.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Keith Hughes <keithahughes@QWEST.NET>
Subject:      Re: AC High Side - line leak - rubber hose
In-Reply-To:  <20080619035142.E86735D1408@mpls-mf-01.inet.qwest.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:06:14 -0400 > From: "Jack R." <jack007@COMCAST.NET> > Subject: Re: AC High Side - line leak - rubber hose > > Roger, > > I have a 4 year old, new compressor, a new condenser, have already changed > all the 0-rings. I have the professional gages, and my system held a vacuum > when last charged, before my engine swap. The system is currently empty, > due to the excessive leak in the High side hose, so when I swap the hose, I > can put my vacuum (thanks to Harbor Freight $17) on the system to pull all > the air and moisture out. I will change the dryer too, before the recharge. > And, of course, before you evacuate the system. > I do have about 6 or 7 cans of R12 on my shelf, but intend to swap to R134a, > and save the R12 for my 91 Mazda Miata (which uses 1/2 can a year). > > I have done AC work before, and will attempt this one. With 134a, in an R12 > conversion, I've been told to keep it at about 80% capacity, due to the > higher efficiency of 134a, with a smaller condenser. R134A is, in no way, *more* efficient. It is much less effective than R-12, and you really need more condenser area (or much higher condenser efficiency) to make it work decently (depending on where you live of course). You use less volume due to the greater expansion, and thus higher head pressures, with R-134A versus R-12. If you have a pre-1987 Westy, with the split condenser, I wouldn't convert if I were you. You won't be happy with the results (using the stock condenser), because these systems are lame with R-12, much less R-134A. BTDT. 'Course it was 112°F here today, so YMMV. Since you're remaking one hose already, you might also check out Arizona Mobile Air (www.azkits.com) and replace your condenser with a more efficient parallel flow style. Just have to modify one additional hose. About $100 for a condenser (and I have no affiliation with them), plus another hose end. You really ought to flush the system as well, to get all the mineral oil out. Good luck.

Keith Hughes '86 Westy Tiico (Marvin)


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.