Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 2008, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:29:01 -0700
Reply-To:     Stephen Grisanti <bike2vcu@YAHOO.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Stephen Grisanti <bike2vcu@YAHOO.COM>
Subject:      Re: Vanagon vs Element..from digest mode..
Comments: To: B Feddish <bfeddish@NETREACH.NET>
In-Reply-To:  <E9402E0208F1446F8EF7FF12956BD85D@cspfr2>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

"Yeah, that Aztec was a cool vehicle; they even had a camping tent, etc. But it was just SOOO ugly."

I was on vacation in Detroit (go figure) and saw a bunch when they were new, but guessed it was because all the drivers were Pontiac execs who'd been ordered to drive them and would not have otherwise.

Stephen

--- On Mon, 7/28/08, B Feddish <bfeddish@NETREACH.NET> wrote:

> From: B Feddish <bfeddish@NETREACH.NET> > Subject: Re: Vanagon vs Element..from digest mode.. > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Date: Monday, July 28, 2008, 5:10 PM > I agree 100%. My Element was bought to replace my Subaru > Legacy Wagon, not > my Vanagon. It did not carry my upright bass and music > gear as well which > was a surprise. > > Yeah, that Aztec was a cool vehicle; they even had a > camping tent, etc. But > it was just SOOO ugly. Buick tried to pretty it up but.... > They have like > the worse resale value of all vehicles. > > Bryan > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vanagon Mailing List > [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of > Jeff Lincoln > Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 4:52 PM > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: Re: Vanagon vs Element..from digest mode.. > > Yeah, I don't really see it as Vanagon vs. Element as > much as just pointing > out that Honda has produced a unique "multi > purpose" vehicle - and is doing > fairly well with it where as VW seems to be, IMHO, ignoring > that market. > > An Element could never replace a Vanagon, Westy or not. > However, if one were > to want a new vehicle the Element is an option out there > with a similar > spirit - even with its pros and cons. > > I think that Pontiac had a similar idea when they came out > with the Aztek - > although god awful ugly there were a lot of options > available that made it a > versitile vehicle. Although I think they fell short of the > mark it was a > step in what I consider the right direction. > > > > > -- > Thanks, > > Jeff > '90 Carat (Grover) > '86 (We call this one Parts) > '78 Bus (Melissa) Patty's Bus


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.