Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (August 2008, week 1)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 1 Aug 2008 19:59:41 -0700
Reply-To:     mdrillock <mdrillock@COX.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         mdrillock <mdrillock@COX.NET>
Subject:      Re: WBX motor rather than ....
In-Reply-To:  <1b85fa6a0808011749n169e2d29t78e5ad06898f97b5@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

I was already a VW nut back almost 30 years ago when it became known that VW was developing a waterboxer. My local independent VW parts/machine shop in SoCal even had a WBX motor on display before they were available in vans. It was mounted in a little shrine area in the showroom for customers to ogle.

IIRC, the automotive press explanation back then was that VW had labor relations issues at some engine manufacturing plant. They needed to keep the plant open and needed enough work for it to be practical to do so. The plant made boxer engines of the 1600 class variety. Worldwide demand was switching to emissions controlled engines and the little airboxer could not make the grade and so fewer were needed but the product still had to be produced for certain applications. VW decided to build a new engine that could use as much of the existing tooling and machinist stations as possible. The waterboxer was the child of this necessity. The waterboxer is the last evolutionary step of the type1 engine.

Waterboxers were produced and fitted to T3 Vanagons for a period of 10 years, beginning summer of 1982 and ending in the summer of 1992. The first and last years were small production numbers. Interestingly, diesel engines were also used for that entire period in the same vehicles. Since the diesels are members of the VW inline 4 cylinder engine family VW could have easily adapted a gas version if they saw enough reason to do so. When the inline gas 4 cyl engine was later used in South African vanagons it was with mounting parts from the diesel engines of the prior European production.

Mark

Zeitgeist wrote: > Porsche now owns a controlling stake in VW. > > While I'm not nearly as much of a WBX basher as some of the silly whiners > around here, I do think they should've saved the millions spent in R&D and > just culled from the VAG parts bin and slipped in an inline (Gas) Audi 2.3 > fiver and VW 1.8/2.0, and (Diesel) Audi 2.0 fiver and VW 1.6/1.9 and called > it good. No need to piddle around with the ancient pushrod stuff linking > back to the thirties. That said, the WBX is a surprisingly robust engine > despite itself, but there was still no valid rationale for its very > existence. > >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.