Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (August 2008, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sun, 17 Aug 2008 19:29:12 -0700
Reply-To:     The Westy man <zolo@FOXINTERNET.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         The Westy man <zolo@FOXINTERNET.NET>
Subject:      Re: 2.1 running again, thanks, list!
Comments: To: Jim Felder <jim.felder@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:  <4d1b79350808171851g29de10aby29af157655b11e65@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
              reply-type=original

I have some pictures but no links. I think, I can only send it as a private email, the list does not allow pictures to put up other than from some kind of link way. So, I guess, I would need your email address to be able to send it. Zoltan

----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Felder" <jim.felder@gmail.com> To: "The Westy man" <zolo@foxinternet.net> Cc: <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com> Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2008 6:51 PM Subject: Re: 2.1 running again, thanks, list!

> Zoltan, would you please send the link to your pictures again? > > Thanks, > > Jim > > On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 8:14 PM, The Westy man <zolo@foxinternet.net> > wrote: >> There are several reason why I like my method. One is the simplicity of >> letting it down on the floor or lifting it to the transmission. The >> other >> is, I don't have to lift the car up only one side a little and I pull the >> engine out on the side not toward the back, on a drip tray that I made >> holes >> into to be able to tie ropes there to pull the engine around. It is a >> little heavy but not too bad. >> So, I don't have the struggle with the fitting to the transmission and >> the >> lifting of the car and the moving around of the engine. And it is a tiny >> equipment, the drip tray is used anyway and it fits behind the cabinet. >> Zoltan >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "mdrillock" <mdrillock@COX.NET> >> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> >> Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2008 5:00 PM >> Subject: Re: 2.1 running again, thanks, list! >> >> >>> For lifting the back of the van higher I make my own wooden stands out >>> of 16" lengths of 4x4 to put under the back tires. >>> >>> I nail 2x4 blocks on the top near each end of the 4x4. These act as >>> wheel chocks so the van can't roll off. Then I jack up each side in turn >>> with a floor jack under the lower control arm until the wooden stand can >>> slide in from the side under the tire and lower down onto the wood >>> stand. For even greater height I have some with 2x4 nailed on both >>> sides, using slightly longer pieces sideways on the bottom for more >>> stability. I often put a set under all 4 wheels and this is great, >>> especially for Syncro drive train work . >>> >>> When putting things like these under the wheels jacking up just the >>> wheel is the way to go. With a piece of wood on the floor jack for >>> protection you can learn to lift under the lower control arm, front or >>> rear, and slide the wood stand into place under the tire with a minimum >>> of jacking. If you jack on the body you must raise the whole van quite a >>> ways before the tire lifts high enough. No need to do this. >>> >>> Mark >>> >>> >>> Jim Felder wrote: >>>> >>>> I'm talking about lifting the vanagon rear end enough to lower the >>>> motor--with a hoist hanging from a saw horse sitting over the back >>>> hatch--and lowering it to the floor. Sounds like we're all doing the >>>> same thing, just a bit differently. I have to get my motor from the >>>> garage hoist to the car on a furniture dolly, so I have just figured >>>> out how to lift the van high enough to accommodate the motor and the >>>> dolly. The plywood with broomsticks is a good idea. If I had not had >>>> to make a trip to a store for a bag of marbles, I was going to use >>>> marbles. They would be omnidirectional--not that it matters once the >>>> engine is off the ground. >>>> >>>> I did use a block and tackle so I could fore-and-aft the engine with >>>> one hand while I used the hoist for up-and-down. >>>> >>>> Jim >>>> >>>> Jim >>>> >>>> On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 5:56 PM, mdrillock <mdrillock@cox.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I agree, lifting from above has too many advantages to go back to >>>>> floor >>>>> jacks. I built my first version to do it that way about 10 years ago >>>>> and >>>>> I still use it. >>>>> I have 4 floor jacks and a tranny jack but for engine >>>>> removal/installation the hoist method is preferred. >>>>> >>>>> Another thing I use is a piece of plywood about 2' x 4'. I put 2 holes >>>>> near one short edge and put a rope handle into those holes. This is >>>>> what I lower the engine down onto. Then I pull the wood with engine >>>>> out >>>>> from under the van with the rope handle. I put the engine back the >>>>> same >>>>> way but I use some broom stick pieces under the plywood to help roll >>>>> the >>>>> engine/plywood back into place. The end of the plywood with the rope >>>>> should be as far from the engine as practical to help with sliding the >>>>> wood. Lowering the engine onto any kind of cart requires the vehicle >>>>> to >>>>> be raised higher than just a piece of plywood does. >>>>> >>>>> My device is more like a sawhorse with room below it for a come-a-long >>>>> type hoist. The added height is required for some Vanagon engines >>>>> though >>>>> not waterboxers. My sawhorse is made of square steel tubing. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Mark >>>>> >>>>> The Westy man wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Amaizing how little recognition that simple device I made, to take >>>>>> out >>>>>> and >>>>>> istall the engine to make it a joy, received. And for me to read >>>>>> about >>>>>> double jacks and all kind of obvious struggles with platforms and >>>>>> what >>>>>> not, >>>>>> is really a puzzle why most don't realized the simplicity without >>>>>> lifting >>>>>> the car both sides. >>>>>> Well, we are not all the same, I guess. I went through my struggles >>>>>> myself >>>>>> too. >>>>>> Zoltan >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.6.3/1612 - >>> Release >>> Date: 8/14/2008 6:03 PM >>> >>> >> > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG. > Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.6.3/1612 - Release Date: 8/14/2008 > 6:03 PM > >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.