Date:         Wed, 27 Aug 2008 07:31:26 -0400
Reply-To:     Edward Duntz <eduntz@HOTMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Edward Duntz <eduntz@HOTMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: 719/5 vs 719/12
Comments: To: ralanen@aol.com
In-Reply-To:  <c9f.378e8687.35e6811a@aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

OK, but can I tell if it has the anti-drainback feature by looking at it? In the W719/5, there is something just inside which looks spring-loaded, and I can't see down to the bottom. The W719/12, looks like a cheap gemeric, I can see the sides and bottom, but the one source I can find that lists part numbers lists this one as the approriate one. Is the anti-drainback valve something I can see?

Ed

> 
> In a message dated 26/08/2008 7:37:24 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> LISTSERV@GERRY.VANAGON.COM writes:
> 
>         The oil filters on both the  1.9 and 2.1 waterboxer engines are
> exactly the same. ANY "GOOD" brand of  filter is acceptable as long as it has the
> anti-drain back feature !


_________________________________________________________________
Talk to your Yahoo! Friends via Windows Live Messenger.  Find out how.
http://www.windowslive.com/explore/messenger?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_messenger_yahoo_082008