Date:         Fri, 12 Sep 2008 05:51:04 -0700
Reply-To:     Michael Snow <slowmachine82@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Michael Snow <slowmachine82@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Aircooled transmissions better?
Comments: cc: vanagonstretch@aol.com
In-Reply-To:  <8CAE2E2229B7A90-7BC-200C@WEBMAIL-MB21.sysops.aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I just finished a swap in the other direction; replaced an aircooled
tranny with a waterboxer unit.  The aircooled transmission is only
better if the slightly higher ring/pinion gearing (4.57 vs 4.86) is
important to you.  In many other aspects, like gear strength, smooth
shifting, and availability of repair parts, I think the later
waterboxer trannies are superior.
--
Michael Snow
1982 Westfalia 1.9TD
http://slowmachine82.blogspot.com/



On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 4:30 AM, Gerry Lepage <vanagonstretch@aol.com> wrote:
> I read in several engine conversion pages that the manual transmission out of air cooled Vanagons are better. Can anyone tell me the reason for this. What is the difference between my 2.1 and the aircooled transmission. I may have a chance to pick one up for future use and just wondering if it would be worth it.
>
> Cheers, Gerry
> www.vanalong.com
>