Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 2008, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:16:44 -0400
Reply-To:     Kim Brennan <kimbrennan@MAC.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Kim Brennan <kimbrennan@MAC.COM>
Subject:      Re: was Friday content Volt GM, etc..Now: SUV is really_____.
Comments: To: Don Hanson <dhanson@GORGE.NET>
In-Reply-To:  <000901c914e5$93d13f00$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes

I learned to drive in a Suburban. We always called it the Monster. Huge vehicle. The one I drove had a tiny V8. Of course, Also my first few months of driving were in WV, where trips to town were infrequent. So a large vehicle to stick 7 or 8 people in was very useful.

The nice thing about Vanagons is that they are deceptively large. While you can stick 7 adults in them comfortably (unlike some of mini- vans where you aren't comfortable.) on the outside, they still are small.

On Sep 12, 2008, at 10:41 AM, Don Hanson wrote:

> I never thought SUV stood for SPORT Utility Vehicle. > I always understood it to mean SUBURBAN Utility Vehicle. The > Suburbs is > where you see most all of them, not doing sports, but usually > sucking down > petrol going to music lessons or shopping or headed here and there > on the > freeways.. > > In the country or in 4wd territory, pickups seem the vehicle of > choice.. > > As an acronym(sp?) "SUV" works pretty well if you think of the "S" as > standing for Suburban.. > As an aside, it may be that the original SUV was the Chevy > Suburban of > around 1958...Very like the today larger 'Murikan SUVs, but a bit > smaller > and certainly quite different from what was being built by anyone > else at > that time. Kinda like a huge Station Wagon built on a truck chassis > and > with lots of ground clearance, but simply awful to ride in. I > remember > riding in one that a pal of my father owned in the '60s, down a long > washboard road in Montana to hit a fishing spot they knew...It must > have > been awful if I remember it still to this day.. > Don Hanson


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.