Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (November 2008, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:21:53 -0500
Reply-To:     Greg Potts <greg@POTTSFAMILY.CA>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Greg Potts <greg@POTTSFAMILY.CA>
Subject:      Re: BLACKBREARD - the debacle ESCALATES
Comments: To: David Kao <dtkao0205@YAHOO.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <886806.65829.qm@web82706.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Hi David,

David Kao wrote: > The insurance company may raise the premium for Matt's insurance > and get all the money back they pay out for his claim. This is the > game they play.

That's not a "game", that's their business model.

Seriously, by having an "at-fault" accident he has proven to be a higher risk to them, justifying a higher premium. Unless he has been accident free for at least the past five years he is pretty much guaranteed a premium increase no matter where he takes his business. At least that's how it is in my market.

> > If they do not treat Matt right by paying what he deserves why stay > insured with them and let them get all their money plus more back? > A good insurance company will not only treat Matt right to pay > out enough to make Matt happy. They may even keep the premium unchanged > instead of punishing Matt.

The only way a bean-counter could justify that behaviour is if he was charging too much in the first place.\, or if he has a totally clean record previously. I don't think we have that data at the moment.

There is a huge difference between a good > and a bad insurance company. It's always a good idea to quickly drop > off from a bad one and switch to another, hopefully a better one. > This helps to drive the bad one out of everyone's way.

We agree on the above, but with a recent at-fault item on your record it might not be the best time to change. And in addition, it's worth noting that in ^my^ market it isn't always easy to change insurers on a 20YO vehicle. Many companies will flat out refuse the coverage.

> > Yes, I agree if they treat Matt right and if he is happy then stay > insured with them. Obviously it seems that's not the case now.

Right now is a bad time to judge an insurance company, as has been said previously, a lowball offer on an unusual vehicle like a vanagon is not uncommon. It certainly couldn't hurt to shop around and compare notes with other NV vanagon owners on the list, but I certainly wouldn't jump until I looked where I was going land...

> > David \ -- Happy Trails,

Greg Potts 1973/74/79 Westfakia "Bob the Tomato" 1987 Wolfsburg Weekender Hardtop www.busesofthecorn.com www.pottsfamily.ca


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.