Date:         Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:48:33 -0700
Reply-To:     Andrew Grebneff <goose1047@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Andrew Grebneff <goose1047@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Body work question
In-Reply-To:  <326099ba0811241313t6c050d67v8031a3f34c54293b@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

> * My question: If the panel can be re-shaped to look the same as it did
> before the accident, why is replacement "the right thing to do"? Is it
> because he'll make more money replacing it rather than reshaping it (making
> it the right thing for HIM to do)?
> OR, rather, are there structural integrity issues at play that I've not been
> advised of?

Reshaping it no doubt means filler. Filler is to be avoided if possible.


--
Andrew Grebneff
Dunedin, New Zealand
Fossil preparator
Mollusc, Toyota & VW van nut
Temporarily in Calgary, AB, Canada
<goose1047@gmail.com>

------------------------------------------------------------
+    To unsubscribe from the Vanagon List send an e-mail to
+    listserv@gerry.vanagon.com with SIGNOFF VANAGON
+    in the body of the message.
------------------------------------------------------------