Date:         Tue, 9 Dec 2008 15:11:12 -0800
Reply-To:     Florian Speier <groups.florian@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Florian Speier <groups.florian@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Tire Performance Difference: 185 vs 205
Comments: To: Matt Drew <t3vanagon@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:  <326099ba0812091456v3bd16d41y63b9716a9db49b8c@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Well, wide tires are something you want in warm climates and on pavement.
narrow tires are better on snow and ice, and better for offroading except
for sandy conditions.
florian

On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Matt Drew <t3vanagon@gmail.com> wrote:

> Volks-
>
> Time has come (when repairs are done on Blackbeard) to replace the tires.
>
> I've currently got 205-70-R14 Toyo 800 Ultras on there (93T Premium
> Touring).
> Considering going back to stock 185s, but given that I've never had
> anything
> BUT the 205s, what can I expect as far as difference in performance?
>
> Bigger question-
> Do I even NEED 205s in a warmer climate like Vegas, especially given that
> Blackbeard stays on pavement?
>
> I'm looking at a bunch of different brands, understanding of course that I
> need a minimum load class of "C" and reinforced walls .  .  .
> Maybe some Hankooks?
>
> Actually having a hard time finding 205s with a high enough load rating,
> surprisinglly. . .
>
>
> -Drew
> '90 GL "Blackbeard"
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> +    To unsubscribe from the Vanagon List send an e-mail to
> +    listserv@gerry.vanagon.com with SIGNOFF VANAGON
> +    in the body of the message.
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>

------------------------------------------------------------
+    To unsubscribe from the Vanagon List send an e-mail to
+    listserv@gerry.vanagon.com with SIGNOFF VANAGON
+    in the body of the message.
------------------------------------------------------------