Date:         Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:29:24 -0500
Reply-To:     Mike S <mikes@FLATSURFACE.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Mike S <mikes@FLATSURFACE.COM>
Subject:      Re: The final answer on the "city light" debate
Comments: To: David Marshall <mailinglist@FASTFORWARD.CA>
In-Reply-To:  <3053.204.239.99.251.1229105641.squirrel@hasenwerk.homeip.n et>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

At 01:14 PM 12/12/2008, David Marshall wrote...
>on a stock ECE or DOT compliant vehicle.

Where did that qualification come from, except your imagination? No one
has tried to claim that there are "ECE/DOT compliant city lights
separate from parking/running/indicatory lights."

Fact is, "city lights" exist, contrary to your claims otherwise. Easy
enough to prove, just do a quick Google of "city lights" and
headlights. Whether they're compliant with 2008 DOT/ECE regulations is
immaterial. Everyone but you seems to know what the term refers to.

------------------------------------------------------------
+    To unsubscribe from the Vanagon List send an e-mail to
+    listserv@gerry.vanagon.com with SIGNOFF VANAGON
+    in the body of the message.
------------------------------------------------------------