Date:         Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:03:57 -0800
Reply-To:     David Marshall <mailinglist@FASTFORWARD.CA>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         David Marshall <mailinglist@FASTFORWARD.CA>
Subject:      Re: The final answer on the "city light" debate
Comments: To: Mike S <mikes@FLATSURFACE.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <20081212192932.4EE3D1165C3@hamburg.alientech.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

I'm not going to get into this any farther if you don't know what's going
on at this point.  The original reference to the difference between
city lights and park lights with ECE compliant lighting in the Vanagon is
in the archives.

David Marshall
VW Adventure Driver and
BMW Adventure Rider
 
http://www.hasenwerk.ca

On Fri,
December 12, 2008 11:29, Mike S wrote:
> 
> At 01:14 PM
12/12/2008, David Marshall wrote...
>>on a stock ECE or DOT
compliant vehicle.
> 
> Where did that qualification come
from, except your imagination? No one
> has tried to claim that
there are "ECE/DOT compliant city lights
> separate from
parking/running/indicatory lights."
> 
> Fact is,
"city lights" exist, contrary to your claims otherwise. Easy
> enough to prove, just do a quick Google of "city lights"
and
> headlights. Whether they're compliant with 2008 DOT/ECE
regulations is
> immaterial. Everyone but you seems to know what
the term refers to.
> 
>
------------------------------------------------------------
> +  
 To unsubscribe from the Vanagon List send an e-mail to
> +   
listserv@gerry.vanagon.com with SIGNOFF VANAGON
> +    in the body
of the message.
>
------------------------------------------------------------
>

------------------------------------------------------------
+    To unsubscribe from the Vanagon List send an e-mail to
+    listserv@gerry.vanagon.com with SIGNOFF VANAGON
+    in the body of the message.
------------------------------------------------------------