Date:         Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:36:44 -0800
Reply-To:     Zeitgeist <gruengeist@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Zeitgeist <gruengeist@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: AC Belt Removal on an automatic 2.1L,
              does it improve fuel economy if removed?
In-Reply-To:  <57A93690-A0D1-4B0F-9992-5B2135AA8E71@mac.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Probably saves the AC clutch bearing more than anything.  No harm to the
compressor, other you're not cycling the AC periodically, as per
recommendation.  Why don't you use AC?

On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Robert Stewart <robertmstewart@mac.com>wrote:

> Hello everyone,
>
> Happy holidays to all.
>
> I am in the process of having my 2.1 Automatic engine rebuilt by a
> local rebuilder. In talking with the mechanic who removed the engine
> for me he asked me if use the AC to which I replied and said "no"...
> So he said I should remove the belt as it take some stress off the
> engine, possibly providing a little more horsepower.
>
> What's the consensus on those who don't you there AC but leave the
> belt on vs removing the belt?
>
> Is there any reason not to leave it on?
>
> Will you get any better performance if you remove it?
>
> Will it hurt the compressor if it's not connected?
>
> Is there any truth to it benefiting performance?
>
> Thanks to all your answers in advance.
>
> Robert
> Bloomingburg NY
> 240,000 Miles 88 Automatic Wolfsburg
>


--
Casey
'87 300TD
'94 100CSQ Avant
'89 Bluestar

------------------------------------------------------------
+    To unsubscribe from the Vanagon List send an e-mail to
+    listserv@gerry.vanagon.com with SIGNOFF VANAGON
+    in the body of the message.
------------------------------------------------------------