Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (February 2009, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:48:59 -0800
Reply-To:     David Marshall <mailinglist@FASTFORWARD.CA>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         David Marshall <mailinglist@FASTFORWARD.CA>
Subject:      Re: The real story about the invention of the WBX?
Comments: To: Jens Jakob Andersen <jayjay@ZORCK.DK>
In-Reply-To:  <vanagon%2009021015460854@GERRY.VANAGON.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Back in the early 80s I am sure VW thought that these motors were great and that adding water cooling would be fairly simple seeing how they could steal parts from the now proven Diesel engine.  They didn't drive them for 250.000kms to find out that the heads would leak and really, what car manufacturer wants something to last that long - VW really wishes our vans would die so we would buy new ones right?  Look at the Beetle er um Porsche 911 today... flat six and water cooled.  Many people will argue that the sole left the 911 a long time ago, but this is the true evolution of the boxer engine.  The only great air-cooled boxer remaining today is the BMW R1200 series and technically these are oil cooled engines... the last air head was in the mid 90s.

David Marshall VW Adventure Driver and BMW Adventure Rider http://www.hasenwerk.ca

On Tue, February 10, 2009 12:46, Jens Jakob Andersen wrote: > > Hi, > > We are trying to find out what happened inside the heads of Schults > and Heinz (VW engineers that we cuss about when working on our cars > ("That day Schultz said to Heinz over lunch "Fit, too tight a fit? No > Heinz, we will place the bolt there - no problem -if people need to > work on that part they will allways have taken the front half > apart")) - on the day when they decided: > "Lets convert the CU to water-cooled - it will be real easy, done > quite fast, and a good stable conversion - instead of just using one > of our great inline.-4 engines" > > So my basic question to this list - does anyone know about why > VW decided to create the WBX, instead of changing to inline-4 in 1983? > > Here is what I have found so far: > "The switch to water-cooling for the boxer engines was made abruptly > mid-year in 1983 because VW could no longer make the air-cooled > engines meet emissions standards" >

> > Happy driving > > Jens Jakob >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.