On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:02:09 -0800, "Zeitgeist" <gruengeist@GMAIL.COM> said: > I think the point being that VW should've used the introduction of the T3 to > turn over a new leaf and leave the flat engine configuration behind for > good. They had a host of robust 4 and 5 cyl engines in '79, so it just > seems silly that they bothered to start with the carry-over 2.0L AC from the > '79 Bay window bus. Despite all the bashing it gets on this list, the WBX > is a good engine, that can typically provide a long service life...but, it > was old-tech engineering that was outdated even when it was introduced. The > Audi 2.3L gasser and 2.0L turbodiesel fivers were a perfect match, though > they should've opted for a distributor-less design in the former to avoid > engine lid issues. > > Oh, if only I ran the world... As I recall from prior discussions of this topic, there was a political consideration as well: by inventing the WBX they could keep employed a lot of the workers who used to build the air-cooled version of the engine. This kept the unions from getting grumpy about layoffs. Allan -- 1991 Vanagon GL |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.