Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (February 2009, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:41:45 -0800
Reply-To:     David Marshall <mailinglist@FASTFORWARD.CA>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         David Marshall <mailinglist@FASTFORWARD.CA>
Subject:      Re: why would anyone want a diesel
Comments: To: Scott Daniel - Turbovans <scottdaniel@TURBOVANS.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <005101c98c91$68a12e70$6401a8c0@PROSPERITY>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hey Scott, putting engines in vehicles is just bad, two sides to both coins -

see ####

David Marshall VW Adventure Driver and BMW Adventure Rider http://www.hasenwerk.ca

On Wed, February 11, 2009 13:40, Scott Daniel - Turbovans wrote: > > why would anyone want a diesel ( btdt ) ..... > except for the better fuel milage, they are costlier over the long run to > purchase, own, operate, and repair, or at least 'quite often' they are. > > typical example....... > nice used geman -made AAZ went into a vanagon.......the techician/owner > took > it to hawaii where he does rental westy's. > it was a darn tight and good AAZ too, only about 40,000 miles on it. Ran > perfect. > He spent.......you know........about 5 grand on that conversion, perhaps a > bit more. Twice what the westy he put it in cost.

#### Not a typical example, most people put in TDIs 'cause they are better than the AAZ engine and cost about the same amount to install.    > got about a good year and a half out of it. > The engine 'overheated' or somehow failed with a rental customer driving > it. > I asked him about it just last night even ...........the head is completey > trashed. > he put a waterboxer back in.

#### In other words the person who was driving it kept on driving it and killed it... not the Diesel's fault.

> diesel engines can do harm to themselvses in ways that gasoline engines > can't ........like a bad injector causing damage in a combustion chamber. > They depend on the condition of the engine itself to create > combustion........if that gets a little weak.........and you don't get > complete combustion. > they are an interferece design and have a critical timing belt..... > and a few other things .......

#### Bad gasoline injectors can do the same thing to a gasser engine.  Poor mixture can burn valves, bad timing will grenade the engine as well too... most if not all modern gasoline engines are also interference design so the same argument is true with a gasoline engine.

> I'll build 'em , or sell 'em .........but I'm tellin' ya ..........'a good > portion of the time' they are not cheaper to purchase, operate, repair, > and > own, even if they do get 30 to 40 % better fuel economy on more expensive > fuel. > They do have great low end torque though, > and you can run plant-based fuels, yes.....no argument there.

#### With todays' fuel prices it costs the same to run a gasser and a Diesel.  You get 30% better fuel economy but in a lot of places you pay 30% more for the fuel.  Here in BC it is 84.9 for gasoline and 91.9 for Diesel so the spread isn't quite so much.

> and sometimes they have a nasty habbit of smoking, smelling, and rattling > and vibarating.

#### All those can be said about a gasoline engine that isn't running correctly too.

> put it this way ........... > they do not make good 'old' engines. They make good expensive new engines.

#### I can't agree more

> the subaru diesel may have some 'not vanagon' friendly > characteristics.........like CAN BUS electronics, > and a too low turbo location for syncro's and off road use.........but > turbo's can be moved too. They're only 2 liters also. > > but it's all fun, and I think mainly the real 'thrill' of diesel is > 'being > different' than the masses. I 'did vanagon diesel about 8 years btw ) > And I won't argue with good low end torque.......you got me there for sure > ! > ...particularily in TDI's. > > your crazy freind. > > ( and I won't even mention a guy I know with a 2004 tdi jetta....... > had an injection pump rebuid that cost about $ 2,000 ........a part that a > fuel injected gasoline doesn't even have...........then it cost about > another $ 900 to get another shop to really dial in the timing belt and > timing exactly right. Ain't no ecomomy there Martha ! )

#### Let's step back a second here and look at everything for a second. 

First off - people replace the wasserboxer for "insert your favorite engine here" because the wasserboxer is broken or otherwise not making them happy.  I think to get a wasserboxer rebuilt "right" is going to cost you 3 to 4K if memory serves me correctly.  This is for a good rebuild and typically that motor will almost always fail sooner especially if someone didn't fit it right.  For example just fixing the leaking head gasket with a reman head and doing nothing else is just asking for trouble.  Reman heads are trouble... the motor is really just trouble.  So really unless you want to do a patch job, not worth it.

Second.  The wasserboxer is only 117ft.lbs of torque.  Good for the old days of 55 MPH but not good for keeping up with the Jone's in their Range Rover or other modern day mega buck car... heck they can't even keep up with a Dodge Caravan.

Third -  Wasserboxers need more fuel

Fourth - Wasserboxers pollute more

Really the wbx is not an engine suited for the year 2010 and beyond.  Once we establish that we need to look at other alternatives.  Subi 2.5s - more I read about these they leak water - the 2.2 is a much better motor for that.  Diesels - cost more to operate than say a small displacement turbo gasser.  Small displacement turbo gassers in a heavy vehilce like the Vanagon take just as much fuel as the Vanagon and you have other maitenance like a turbo that has to work more etc.

No matter how you slice it and no matter what you put in there, that engine is going to be a problem for you.   Best way to get rid of that problem is start with a new or very close to new engine which means spending bucks to do it right.  The problem is that most people who own Vanagons don't have that kind of money so they go back into the same pitfalls.

My reason for choosing Diesel... power, sound, alternative green house gas neutral fuels, if I choose to burn fossil fuels there is less carbon per kilometer than a gasoline powered vehicle.  My 2nd choice would be a VW 1.8T


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.