I have to admit, I swapped my 1.9 with 180k miles with a new Boston Bob 2.1 and I didn't feel any difference. Maybe my 1.9 wasn't in as bad shape as i thought! Jeff On 19-Feb-09, at 10:44 PM, David Kao wrote: > Hum... That's a little disappointing. It may be only 10% more power. > Hopefully it will still make a difference on many slopes that I often > travel on. > > David > > > --- On Thu, 2/19/09, David Beierl <dbeierl@ATTGLOBAL.NET> wrote: > >> From: David Beierl <dbeierl@ATTGLOBAL.NET> >> Subject: Re: Replace 1.9 with a 2.1 WBX > >> The 2.1 US Vanagons were rated 95 or 90 SAE hp @ 4800 rpm, >> 117 lb-ft torque. >> >> >> -- >> David Beierl - Providence RI USA -- >> http://pws.prserv.net/synergy/Vanagon/ >> '84 Westy "Dutiful Passage," '85 GL >> "Poor Relation" |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.