Oops -- that's 200cc more in the 2.1. Yeah, I can see that being "noticable" though still not really significant, depending on what else was done with the 2.1 model to get more power out of it. Allan David Kao <dtkao0205@YAHOO.COM> writes: > What I intend to do is to rebuilt it using as many 1.9 parts on top of > the engine and swap out my 1.9 from my 83 Westy. The 1.9 engine was > rebuilt by me last year. But I have always wanted a 2.1. I need more > power because I went to Yosemite very frequently. I wonder how much extra power the 2.1 has? I mean, it's only an extra 20cc. That's like a chain-saw motor. > Oh, BTW, I paid $100 for the 2.1. I think this is very cheap. The shop > said they have had it for 4 months so they just want to get rid of it. $100 for a core is not bad, depending on what all it needs. Try to find out as much as you can before you start spending money, so you don't end up hundreds of dollars into the project before discovering some kind of back-breaking problem. Allan -- 1991 Vanagon GL |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.