Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (February 2009, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sun, 15 Feb 2009 09:33:49 -0800
Reply-To:     Loren Busch <starwagen@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Loren Busch <starwagen@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: VW bus and beetle on Yahoo's 10 deadlies car list. Any thruth?
In-Reply-To:  <89604.77667.qm@web45312.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

RE: Deadliest Cars I agree that the writer shows a lot of ignorance in the comments on several of those vehicles. For example if he was going to talk abou the swing axle on the 300 SL then what about the Triumph Spitfire and it's swing axle. I couldn't even enter an Autocross or go on the track for training until I showed that I had the Empi de-cambering bar installed. But, and here is the rub, without the author finding the facts or citing the right reasons, the VW Bug earned it's place on that list. The insurance company statistics in the '60's had the Bug at the top of the list, highest single car accident rate of anything on the road in North America and highest single car accident fatality rate. I saw those figures myself in what was supposed to be a confidential copy of a summary report from the part of the insurance industry that kept track of such things at the time. That was before the government agencies were keeping track of such numbers and making them public. And a footnote paragraph in that report cited driver attitude and, if I can recall the wording, 'handling characteristics under adverse driving conditions' as the reason. Basically, many young people thought they were driving a sports car until they overcooked it going into a curve. I know a lot of you on these lists drove Beetles during that time (I didn't) so comments on handling would be appropriate. All I know is what the statistics I saw in 1968 said.


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.