Date:         Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:22:46 -0800
Reply-To:     Scott Daniel - Turbovans <scottdaniel@TURBOVANS.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Scott Daniel - Turbovans <scottdaniel@TURBOVANS.COM>
Subject:      Re: Replace 1.9 with a 2.1 WBX
Comments: To: David Kao <dtkao0205@YAHOO.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
              reply-type=original

'ca smog system' ?
there's only one version of US model 1983 1/2  1.9 liter waterboxer vanagon
engine.

air-cooled vanagons, those are 'Ca' or 'non-Ca'...............but
waterboxers.....only one version, pretty sure.
I mean, the Oregon and whatever waterboxer vans I've seen are no different
than the California ones I've known.
correct me if that's not correct.
Scott


----- Original Message -----
From: "David Kao" <dtkao0205@YAHOO.COM>
To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM>
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 10:19 PM
Subject: Re: Replace 1.9 with a 2.1 WBX


> No, I do not have power steering, nor air conditioning. It's
> an 83, the very first generation watercooled vanagon in USA.
> But it has a California Somg system in it, if that makes a
> difference.
>
> David
>
>
> --- On Thu, 2/19/09, David Beierl <dbeierl@attglobal.net> wrote:
>
>> From: David Beierl <dbeierl@attglobal.net>
>> Subject: Re: Replace 1.9 with a 2.1 WBX
>> To: dtkao0205@yahoo.com
>> Cc: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
>> Date: Thursday, February 19, 2009, 8:51 PM
>> At 11:44 PM 2/19/2009, David Kao wrote:
>
>> If you have power steering and can do without it...the pump
>> sucks up a surprising amount of power.  Ken Wilford wrote
>> quite a while ago about his surprise at the difference in
>> pick-up with and without.
>>
>>
>> -- David Beierl - Providence RI USA --
>> http://pws.prserv.net/synergy/Vanagon/
>> '84 Westy "Dutiful Passage," '85 GL
>> "Poor Relation"