Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (March 2009, week 1)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 6 Mar 2009 10:00:39 -0700
Reply-To:     Keith Hughes <keithahughes@Q.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Keith Hughes <keithahughes@Q.COM>
Subject:      Re: Replacing FI with Carbs on WBX 2.1L
In-Reply-To:  <BAY0-PAMC1-F3gHb2G10000b02e@bay0-pamc1-f3.bay0.hotmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

> Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 23:36:18 -0600 > From: John Rodgers <inua@CHARTER.NET> > Subject: Replacing FI with Carbs on WBX 2.1L > > I've seen mention of this a time or two, and wondered of any advantages. > No experience to compare, so wondering what others have done, and what > was the outcome. I have a project in mind, and FI is of no advantage in > the application. I've got a basket case engine I'm sot of interested in > building up as a test bed for a new kind of carburetor that may > adequately compete with FI, of maybe even better it. Part of an ongoing > mileage quest. The idea is not so much to make the newest and greatest > and most efficient new car, but to make old cars more efficient - > because if fuel ramps up again, there is going to be a lot of old cars > resurrected from the bone yards because the new ones are going to cost > so much as we switch over to electric or green or both. > > Anyone notice that fuel prices are climbing again - not so fast, but > rising none the less. Makes me nervous. > > John Rodgers > 88 Gl Driver John, the only advantages of carburetor(s) vs FI are system costs, and ease of repair (*if* you know carburetors). Dual carbs creates other routine adjustment requirements as well. If FI wasn't more efficient and reliable, production cars would still be using carbs. Yes, emissions was a big factor in necessitating the switchover, but ask yourself why that was true - to more precisely adjust and control air/fuel ratios in response to varying engine operating parameters. Something a mechanical carb cannot do at all. There were some hybrid electromechanical carbs (Hyundai made a particularly execrable version), but none met with any great success AFAIK.

I haven't tried carbs on a 2.1L wbx, but I did switch over to a progressive Solex 2bl on a 2.0L air cooled in a '78 Westy. Never liked the throttle response, had issues with emissions, and couldn't get as good of mileage as with FI (well, until the ECU croaked, which is what started the process). I went to a Weber 2bl, and it was no better, and then went to dual DeLortos. The DeLortos were great for throttle response and performance, but worse on mileage and impossible to pass emissions. After a couple years of dinking around, I went back to FI.

Keith Hughes '86 Westy Tiico (Marvin)


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.