At 04:38 PM 3/13/2009, Gary Bawden wrote: >using the blue and near-UV ones, since they look so cool. Using my >status as an old codger I would wish to warn folks that the blue and Not to mention that blue is a very difficult illumination under which to read things clearly, because your eyes have to keep changing focus between the blue and any other colors in the environment. Extreme example of this is blue field with red lettering or vise versa -- it shimmers and vibrates and is generally hard to look at. In optical terms, your single-element, water-based eye lenses have a lot of chromatic abberation, which the extensive in-line image processing deals with as well as it can. Blue is cool, but functionally it sucks.
-- David Beierl - Providence RI USA -- http://pws.prserv.net/synergy/Vanagon/ '89 Po' White Star "Scamp" |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.