Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (March 2009, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sat, 14 Mar 2009 10:47:11 -0400
Reply-To:     Chris S <szpejankowski@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Chris S <szpejankowski@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Tires - Why oh why NOT?
Comments: To: Mike S <mikes@flatsurface.com>
In-Reply-To:  <20090314140049.524A31165C1@hamburg.alientech.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Ford Aerostars sold by the bazillions, so consider the odds. Besides, I'm talking about fitting larger Mercedes wheels with tires of proper load rating, not using our 14'' donuts of doom. Most of you seem to be missing that point.

On 3/14/09, Mike S <mikes@flatsurface.com> wrote: > At 08:58 AM 3/14/2009, Chris S wrote... > >>Now, let's compare some more. >> >>I once had a 1993 Ford Aerostar. Its curb weight was 3400 lbs and it >>could carry 7 passengers. No where did the manufacturer specify >>reinforced tires. The stock 215/70 R14 tires, which fit the Vanagon, >>have a max load rating of 1554 lbs. The tires are NOT reinforced. > > That's not a standard load rating: > http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tiretech/techpage.jsp?techid=35 > > Would that be the 1993 Aerostar talked about here? > http://www.allworldauto.com/comments/1993_ford_aerostar_comments_and_complaints_24771.html > > Where the following comments have been made: > > "Tire blew out on interstate, entire side. was driving at normal speed > in normal conditions." > > "Tire blew out, when vehicle stopped tread was seperated from rest of > tire." > > "my front left tire suddenly blew out." > > "the left rear tire suddenly went flat" > > "failed with a tread separation blowout" > > "tread coming off tire" > >>A 1991 Vanagon GL has its curb weight listed at 3400 lbs. But somehow >>its tires are required to be reinforced. > > You're not convincing anyone that you know more than the factory > engineers. Why would you presume to apply Ford specifications to a VW? > It would just as valid (that is, completely invalid, although quite > obviously safer) to go the other way. As has been pointed out, VW never > equipped the Vanagon with tires having a capacity of less than 1609 > lbs. (load rating 97), although they could have saved money by doing > so. > > Hey, I've got a set of el-cheapo 185R14 passenger car tires, with rims, > which the PO had on. Want to buy them cheap? > > >

-- Sent from my mobile device

Chris S. Disclaimer: "Death and serious injury may occur"


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.