Date:         Mon, 9 Mar 2009 18:03:19 -0500
Reply-To:     David Beierl <dbeierl@ATTGLOBAL.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         David Beierl <dbeierl@ATTGLOBAL.NET>
Subject:      Re: Replacing FI with Carbs on WBX 2.1L
Comments: To: Keith Hughes <keithahughes@Q.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <BLU0-SMTP9855EAEDBB5FC26F8060C7DAA00@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

At 12:58 AM 3/9/2009, Keith Hughes wrote:
>points:  Assuming you make it through your nuclear EMP, or Mayan mystery
>apocalypse, you'll still be dead in the water unless you go back to
>points and condenser as well (none of those nasty ICU's and Hall
>sensors), with all the charming issues they present. So now, you're
>looking at poor spark control as well as degraded fuel delivery
>control.   Additionally, when talking about carbs, Bernoulli is the

Fact is, modern cars require modern infrastructure to operate.  If
the infrastructure goes away, for *whatever* reason, we'll be right
back to Model Ts that the local blacksmith can mostly fix.  But when
the infrastructure *is* there, they beat the old ones all hollow.

  --
David Beierl - Providence RI USA -- http://pws.prserv.net/synergy/Vanagon/
'89 Po' White Star "Scamp"