Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 2009, week 1)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 6 Apr 2009 21:36:53 -0700
Reply-To:     Scott Daniel - Turbovans <scottdaniel@TURBOVANS.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Scott Daniel - Turbovans <scottdaniel@TURBOVANS.COM>
Subject:      Re: Sequential vs batch RE: digifant injection
Comments: To: Zeitgeist <gruengeist@GMAIL.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
              reply-type=original

wow, that's saying something ......... if you consider it toke-worthy to have discovered after all this time that it doesn't matter which injector wire you plug onto which injector on a waterboxer vanagon engine. You can also see it in the wiring diagrams, for example on page 97.106........... it shows one white wire connecting pin 12 of the ECU to all four injectors. As long as we know they don't digitize or 'can-bus' 4 signals on that one wire ( which they don't of course ) ....it shows right there that the ECU fires the 4 injectors as one big injector. And it does it by supplying ground to them to energize them, like one big four-part injector.

and it would be shocking to think something worked one way for 20 years, only to discover after all that time it's different than you thought ! Welcome to 2009 - lol ! :-) Scott www.turbovans.com

----- Original Message ----- From: "Zeitgeist" <gruengeist@GMAIL.COM> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 9:15 PM Subject: Re: Sequential vs batch RE: digifant injection

> Ya know, I've been tinkering with these beasties for over twenty years, > and > this is the first I've heard of L-Jet and Digifant being "batch-fire" > injected...so, does that mean that you could swap the injection plugs > between cylinders and there'd be no difference? Wow, that's > mind-boggling. > It's like you've exposed Santa, the easter bunny and Area 51 all at > once...I'm deflated. I need a drink...or a toke...damn > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:05 PM, pdooley <psdooley@verizon.net> wrote: > >> Even with sequential fuel injection, intake valve opening events happen >> so >> fast that by 2-3k rpm the injector is spraying part of the fuel on closed >> intake valves anyway. The fuel just doesn't have that much time to pool. >> >> Sequential is good for emissions and improves economy slightly. If you >> spend much time in traffic or light cruise, this may be a good upgrade. >> >> For max power, a batch fire system is just as good as sequential. >> > > -- > Casey > '87 300TD > '94 100CSQ Avant > '89 Bluestar


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.