My recollection was that, oddly enough, Digifant I came *after* Digifant II, and was used on California cars. It had some minimal OBD-like fault code capabilities, a "check engine" lamp on the dash, among other things. Is this correct? Allan
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 22:13 -0400, "David Beierl" <dbeierl@ATTGLOBAL.NET> wrote: > At 07:53 PM 4/30/2009, Dave Arthur wrote: > >Were there two implementations of Digifant on the 2.1 WBX? Which would apply > >to the MV code engines? > > Only one, I reckon. Digifant didn't become Digifant I until there > was a Digifant II to compare against. > > >that). I have an S&S headers setup and of course no port before the cat. If > >I measure CO and the tail pipe will that suffice or do I absolutely need to > >measure upstream? > > Sounds as though S&S weren't thinking very clearly. You'll need to > get a test bung welded on...you absolutely have to measure upstream > of the CAT because one of its main functions is converting 2CO + O2 --> > 2CO2 > > > > -- > David Beierl - Providence RI USA -- > http://pws.prserv.net/synergy/Vanagon/ > '89 Po' White Star "Scamp" |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.