Don, I think the inline 4 VW can be a great and economical conversion for people to do themselves. It just isn't always sweetness and light, or a do it in a weekend job. Take your van for example. The 83 diesel Vanagon tranny and engine mounting parts fit very nicely into an 84 like yours. This is the simplest case there is for replacing a WBX, if no PS and no A/C. The 83 DV cooling hoses and engine mounting position make for an easy fit, pretty much best case scenario, nearly a slam dunk. But most people have PS and A/C and this makes for a more difficult conversion if they want those thing connected and working. Most people have 86+ vans that neither the 82 or 83 diesel hoses would fit the cooling pipes of. Most of the diesel mounting parts to be found are 82 type and these are not a direct bolt up for any waterboxer vans and the hoses are not right either even for early waterboxer vans like yours. Of course these issues can all be overcome but they add to the project scope and catch many by surprise. In summary, the simplest home VW inline 4 gas conversions are done to what were originally diesel vans so they fit right in. Then there are a few other early models they fit into with very minor issues. For the remainder the list of conflicts and issues grows much larger. Mark Don Hanson wrote: > Good points all, Mark. > A 'sample of one'...my own experience.. not much of a data base. > > I've been lurking around the Vanagon sources for a few years now. Maybe I > have been giving the false impression that I think the VW inline four > conversion I have is the "One True Way". Not my intention to try to > 'convert' anyone. When this subject comes up, though, posting my own > experience with this particular Vanagon configuration seems like it may be > useful to someone out there. I know that when I was looking, I found very > little info about this type of Vanagon, and I searched diligently for > information and impressions. > I sometimes hear (off list posts) from others who run this combo..The > general tone of these posts seems to be something like..."Hey, I have an > inline gas vanagon, too...But Boy, did I have a nice weekend trip to the > mountains..." or "Yeah, my Rabbit powered van works good, now let's talk > about something fun..." So maybe there's not much to say about them, > really. Or maybe they aren't mentioned much because they DO really > suck..Maybe mine is the only 'good one' to ever . > Yes, any engine conversion will likely not be simple. And "30-80k life > expectancy for a WBX motor?" Pulled that outta thin air. But in the few > years I've been on Vanagon list I have now 'seen' the same names come around > sometimes with "Weeping headgaskets, again" on their Subject Line.. > As you said, Mark..there are certain things about the WBX that are not to > like..dunno, other than what I read because I never owned one..so I deserve > to be flamed for 'hearsay-based' opinions. > > Don Hanson > > |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.