Date:         Wed, 15 Jul 2009 17:48:54 -0700
Reply-To:     Scott Daniel - Turbovans <scottdaniel@TURBOVANS.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Scott Daniel - Turbovans <scottdaniel@TURBOVANS.COM>
Subject:      Re: FS- 1991 Vanagon Westfalia CORRECTION
Comments: To: Robin <robindavies@GMAIL.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
              reply-type=original

hey, well it read well........
'70 mph at 35K rpm ' ........
bit undergreared ay !!?

might want to change to another R & P ratio there. .

nice to see your note Robin.

Turns out my friend in Wisconsin near this van .....is in contact with the
seller........
and they even have a mutual friend in common .....something like that.

now ........my client/friend is asking me if 91 is a good year, what's
better and worse about 91's over say, 85's .....
blah blah blah.
just get it, unless it's rusted to death or something ......
and  'keep it in the family' too .......
the vanagon family.
Scott
www.turbovans.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Robin" <robindavies@GMAIL.COM>
To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM>
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 6:42 AM
Subject: FS- 1991 Vanagon Westfalia CORRECTION


> OOOPS! Ben gets the award for catching my slip:
>
> 1991 Vanagon Westfalia
> 185k miles
> Manual transmission
> Alpine white
> Grey interior
> All camper utilities work
> Runs well. Does 70 mph at 35k rpm on the flats all day. SHOULD BE 3.5k
> RPM! I had a 2 stroke motorcycle that liked 13k rpm. My neighbors
> loved me!
> Also, it has A/C but it is pretty damn ineffective. I have never
> charged or better yet updated the system.
> $4000 Firm
>
> May be sold, as it seems I could have asked for more $, but I'm not
> gonna haggle. Time to move on. Don't worry Vanamaniacs, I'll be back
> in the fold at a later date.
>
> R.
> --
> Pointlessly blogging at www.robindavies.us
> Try something new every day.