Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 20:58:05 -0500
Reply-To: Stephen Edwards <welfarewrkr@IGC.ORG>
Sender: Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From: Stephen Edwards <welfarewrkr@IGC.ORG>
Subject: Re: Interesting Tire Comparison
In-Reply-To: <200907231452.1mu3oHS43Nl3qU1@albert.mail.atl.earthlink.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Cheers Ron!
The Hankook RA08's in 195R14 that I bought from you more than 4 years
and 40 to 50,000 miles ago are still running fine.
They aren't snow tires, but then they weren't expected to be, and for
everything else - including ride and handling - they're great.
Steve Edwards, Chicago - 91 GL daily driver with Subaru 2.2 in the
trunk.
On Jul 23, 2009, at 1:44 PM, Automatic digest processor wrote:
> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:16:49 -0400
> From: The Bus Depot <vanagon@BUSDEPOT.COM>
> Subject: Interesting Tire Comparison
>
> The latest Car And Driver Magazine did a head-to-head of 10
> comparably rated
> tires from competing manufacturers. One of their goals was to find
> out if an
> off-brand tire with the same tread pattern and sidewall specs
> (traction,
> load capacity, speed rating, etc.) as a name brand tire would actually
> perform as well (or at least close).
>
> In the end they rated a Dunlop tire #1, closely followed by a
> Hankook that
> was half its price and the cheapest of them all (besides the off-brand
> tire). As for the comparably-spec'd Chinese off-brand tire? It
> scored so
> poorly that "we had to round up its score to zero to keep it from
> being
> negative" and could not recommend it even at the $57 "bargain"
> price. Even
> the second worst tire in the ratings almost tripled its score. (As an
> interesting aside, the Kumho tire was highly rated on dry roads,
> but was
> undone by wet-road handling that was "nothing short of diabolical.")
>
> How does this relate to Vanagon tires? Of course the results
> cannot be
> applied directly, as these high performance tires are not Vanagon
> tires. But
> it clearly illustrates that you cannot go by sidewall specs (such
> as load
> capacity) alone. Those specs are important in order to rule out
> tires that
> are simply underrated for the vehicle and must be dismissed out of
> hand ...
> but the remaining tires can still vary from "excellent" to
> "diabolical." In
> Vanagon speak, this means that a cheap tire with a C or D load
> rating may
> still be a lousy tire, not remotely comparable to a quality tire
> with the
> same load rating.
>
> Choose wisely.
>
> See http://busdepot.com/details/tires.jsp for more on Vanagon tire
> safety.
>
>
> - Ron Salmon
> The Bus Depot, Inc.
> www.busdepot.com
> (215) 234-VWVW
>
> _____________________________________________
> Toll-Free for Orders by PART # : 1-866-BUS-DEPOT
|