Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (August 2009, week 1)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:22:13 -0400
Reply-To:     David Beierl <dbeierl@ATTGLOBAL.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         David Beierl <dbeierl@ATTGLOBAL.NET>
Subject:      MODERATOR Trimming replies was Re: temp sensors?
Comments: To: Jake de Villiers <crescentbeachguitar@GMAIL.COM>
Comments: cc: bent Syncro <syncro@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:  <71d9cdf90907180737u66c9be5as31c22144c7cee8a5@mail.gmail.co m>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 9:04 PM, Jim Arnott <jrasite@eoni.com> wrote:

> PLEASE!!!!!!! > > Trim the replies.

At 10:37 AM 7/18/2009, Jake de Villiers wrote: >I've heard those words before but have no idea what they mean. Is this >something I'm supposed to do as well? > >Perhaps you could explain for those of us who aren't computer professionals. > >Thanks, Jake

It means to trim off those parts of the message you're replying to that are not necessary to establish continuity. A decent rule of thumb is to leave no more of the original message than twice as much as your own contribution.

The particular message that reached Jim's breaking point was quoted seven levels deep, and had not been trimmed in any way by any of the seven previous posters -- then the current poster added six words to it.

Trimming replies is a long-accepted part of list etiquette worldwide, and one that we on this list tend to do rather badly. The universe seems to be divided into those who think this is important and tend to get stressed when it isn't done, and those who neither notice nor care. Those of us who think it is important think so partly because it reduces the load on the listserver and the internet and people's dialup connections; but *primarily* because it reduces the load on *us* to read and understand the thing -- that's where the etiquette part comes in. Those of us running the list think it's important and it is therefor a list policy that it should be so, although we have been extremely lenient on enforcing it.

Cheers,

-- David Beierl - Providence RI USA -- http://pws.prserv.net/synergy/Vanagon/ '89 Po' White Star "Scamp"


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.