Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (August 2009, week 5)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:30:55 -0700
Reply-To:     Rocket J Squirrel <camping.elliott@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Rocket J Squirrel <camping.elliott@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Wire size question.
Comments: To: neil N <musomuso@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:  <c4e7c5f90908311300m1a83691fl258c02ac1fa84b19@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

The differences between your ampacity chart and the one I referred to might be what one can expect stranded wire (which has less copper cross-section) versus solid-core wire.

But the writer talked about how current is carried on the surface of the wire and he right -- at high frequencies, I've never heard anyone describe a "skin effect" at DC, so I am not certain whether that writer knows his onions or not.

If in doubt, when looking at two ampacity charts, use the one that is more conservative. Your chart shows 8 gauge capable of carrying 150A for "short runs" at 12v and 46A at 110V, and the difference must be due either to worrying about heating effects or from having used two different sources of data, like household building codes for 110V AC wiring practices, and some other source for 12VDC.

The chart I referenced shows 8 gauge as being suitable to carry 23 amps, and voltage is not considered because watts, power, are not part of the ampacity of the wire until you start to look at how many volts you will lose when your current goes through that wire due to the resistance of the wire. 20A flowing through 8 feet of 8 gauge is 20A -- the wire doesn't know whether there is a 12V or a 110V source. You could have a 12 volt bulb that wants 20A or a 110V bulb that wants 20A -- the wire only knows how many amps are going through it and, based on the resistance of the wire, how warm it will get.

Ampacity -- current carrying capability -- does not decrease as wire length goes up. What does happen is that you start to lose more and more volts as the wire length goes up. But without knowing how many volts you are starting with and how much voltage loss you can tolerate at the other end, there's simply no way for one chart to tell you what is an acceptable wire diameter to use. That's back of envelope calculation time.

For example. Assume I have a 12V battery, and I want to power a device that wants 12 volts, but can operate just fine down to 11.5 volts. Say that device uses 10 amps to operate. And say that device is 100 feet from the battery, and I am running a wire to it, and a return wire back, so my overall run is 200 feet. Okay, maximum voltage loss I can tolerate is 0.5V over 200'. The resistance of the wire, then, per Ohms law is R = E/I or 0.5/10 = R, 0.05 ohm.

4 gauge wire has a resistance of 0.25 ohm per 1,000 feet, or 0.05 ohm per 200 feet. It has an ampacity of 60A carrying current, so it can handle 10A all day long. The total power loss in the wire will be P = E*I or 0.5 * 10 = 5 watts. 5 watts spread out over 200 feet of wire will raise its temperature by . . . nothing. If I use skinnier wire more volts will be lost, the wire will run warmer, and the device will not get the volts is wants. If I use fatter wire, the device will get more than 11.5 volts, and the wire will run cooler -- not that it was warm to start with, but my out of pocket cost for the wire will go up.

You can change wires sizes as many times as you want over a run, as long as the skinny bit, which is handling as much current as the fat bits, can handle the current given its length and its contribution to the overall resistive losses is calculated into the overall copper losses.

I was assuming that Don was going to use the engine body for the return portion of the round trip. But even if not, 16 feet of 8 gauge wire will still only lose 0.2v, the wattage loss (heating) of the wire will double but be spread out over twice the wire, so spot temperatures will not change (i.e., still immeasurable for our purposes).

I have no idea how them offroaders got their information, it's possible that automobile manufactures or modifiers have developed rules of thumb for things like this. Looks like a useful chart, anyway, as it is very conservative. It makes hidden assumptions but I don't think you can go wrong by following the chart.

But for me, the bottom line is that if I was running 8 feet of wire to (and maybe 8' back from) a lamp that drew 20A, I'd not hesitate to use 8 gauge wire.

-- Mike "Rocket J Squirrel" Elliott 84 Westfalia: Mellow Yellow ("The Electrical Banana") 74 Utility Trailer. Ladybug Trailer, Inc., San Juan Capistrano Bend, OR KG6RCR

On 8/31/2009 1:00 PM neil N wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Rocket J > Squirrel<camping.elliott@gmail.com> wrote: >> 8 gauge wire has the ampacity to handle 20A. It's rated for 23A carrying >> current, and fuses (melts, pretty much) at 472 amps. Chart here: >> >> http://www.interfacebus.com/Copper_Wire_AWG_SIze.html >> >> An 8 foot run of 8 gauge wire will have .005 ohm of resistance. At 20 amps >> this will result in 0.1 volt less voltage getting to your lamps. Not >> noticeable. >> >> So, 8 gauge can handle the job without getting hot 20 amps over 8 feet >> will result in only 2 watts of heating. > > > > Ok, now I feel foolish. > > Are the wiring charts I just emailed to Don/list (shown below) > incorrect, or am I just using them incorrectly? > > Bowing and deferring to the truly electrically knowledgeable, > > Neil. > > > > Neil wrote: > > > This one shows #8 good to 150 amps: > > http://www.rowand.net/Shop/Tech/WireCapacityChart.htm > > This chart shows how ampicity of a wire decreases as length increases > > http://www.offroaders.com/tech/12-volt-wire-gauge-amps.htm > > It shows #8 wire is good up to 150 amps BUT that's up to max. 10' run > (round trip) > > > >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.