Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (August 2009, week 5)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:52:50 -0700
Reply-To:     Don Hanson <dhanson928@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Don Hanson <dhanson928@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Wire size question.
Comments: To: Rocket J Squirrel <camping.elliott@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:  <4A9C410F.4020209@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

OK, now for some accurate numbers. Thanks to Al, I know the bulb is 100w. The wire pigtail that came with the Unity light is 14 g wire. I was thinking smaller wire = smaller gauge wire...wrong. So if Unity sent it out with 14 g and I use about the same or even 12 or 10g I should be ok, I guess. I really need to spend some time and learn more about wiring..Maybe soon, when the monsoons hit here in the Northwest and I have to move indoors for 6 months of rain...or head south again... Thanks all, Don Hanson

PS. At night on back roads or in deer infested areas, I turn my spotlight onto the right shoulder of the road about a mile ahead at 65mph. I have it coming through the roof just behind my inside rear veiw mirror, so I can reach it easily while driving. This allows me to see deer standing or side roads that might be possible overnight spots, in good time to slow up. I then can put the light up the side road to see where it might go, without turning the van into what may be a dicey detour..Backing up, it is also very useful. I can and do leave it aimed, at night, and can just flip the switch off if I encounter oncoming traffic..Pretty handy Could probably warm up a can of beans with the beam, it is quite bright...

On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Rocket J Squirrel < camping.elliott@gmail.com> wrote:

> The differences between your ampacity chart and the one I referred to > might be what one can expect stranded wire (which has less copper > cross-section) versus solid-core wire. > > But the writer talked about how current is carried on the surface of the > wire and he right -- at high frequencies, I've never heard anyone describe > a "skin effect" at DC, so I am not certain whether that writer knows his > onions or not. > > If in doubt, when looking at two ampacity charts, use the one that is more > conservative. Your chart shows 8 gauge capable of carrying 150A for "short > runs" at 12v and 46A at 110V, and the difference must be due either to > worrying about heating effects or from having used two different sources > of data, like household building codes for 110V AC wiring practices, and > some other source for 12VDC. > > The chart I referenced shows 8 gauge as being suitable to carry 23 amps, > and voltage is not considered because watts, power, are not part of the > ampacity of the wire until you start to look at how many volts you will > lose when your current goes through that wire due to the resistance of the > wire. 20A flowing through 8 feet of 8 gauge is 20A -- the wire doesn't > know whether there is a 12V or a 110V source. You could have a 12 volt > bulb that wants 20A or a 110V bulb that wants 20A -- the wire only knows > how many amps are going through it and, based on the resistance of the > wire, how warm it will get. > > Ampacity -- current carrying capability -- does not decrease as wire > length goes up. What does happen is that you start to lose more and more > volts as the wire length goes up. But without knowing how many volts you > are starting with and how much voltage loss you can tolerate at the other > end, there's simply no way for one chart to tell you what is an acceptable > wire diameter to use. That's back of envelope calculation time. > > For example. Assume I have a 12V battery, and I want to power a device > that wants 12 volts, but can operate just fine down to 11.5 volts. Say > that device uses 10 amps to operate. And say that device is 100 feet from > the battery, and I am running a wire to it, and a return wire back, so my > overall run is 200 feet. Okay, maximum voltage loss I can tolerate is 0.5V > over 200'. The resistance of the wire, then, per Ohms law is R = E/I or > 0.5/10 = R, 0.05 ohm. > > 4 gauge wire has a resistance of 0.25 ohm per 1,000 feet, or 0.05 ohm per > 200 feet. It has an ampacity of 60A carrying current, so it can handle 10A > all day long. The total power loss in the wire will be P = E*I or 0.5 * 10 > = 5 watts. 5 watts spread out over 200 feet of wire will raise its > temperature by . . . nothing. If I use skinnier wire more volts will be > lost, the wire will run warmer, and the device will not get the volts is > wants. If I use fatter wire, the device will get more than 11.5 volts, and > the wire will run cooler -- not that it was warm to start with, but my out > of pocket cost for the wire will go up. > > You can change wires sizes as many times as you want over a run, as long > as the skinny bit, which is handling as much current as the fat bits, can > handle the current given its length and its contribution to the overall > resistive losses is calculated into the overall copper losses. > > I was assuming that Don was going to use the engine body for the return > portion of the round trip. But even if not, 16 feet of 8 gauge wire will > still only lose 0.2v, the wattage loss (heating) of the wire will double > but be spread out over twice the wire, so spot temperatures will not > change (i.e., still immeasurable for our purposes). > > I have no idea how them offroaders got their information, it's possible > that automobile manufactures or modifiers have developed rules of thumb > for things like this. Looks like a useful chart, anyway, as it is very > conservative. It makes hidden assumptions but I don't think you can go > wrong by following the chart. > > But for me, the bottom line is that if I was running 8 feet of wire to > (and maybe 8' back from) a lamp that drew 20A, I'd not hesitate to use 8 > gauge wire. > > -- > Mike "Rocket J Squirrel" Elliott > 84 Westfalia: Mellow Yellow ("The Electrical Banana") > 74 Utility Trailer. Ladybug Trailer, Inc., San Juan Capistrano > Bend, OR > KG6RCR > > > > On 8/31/2009 1:00 PM neil N wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Rocket J >> Squirrel<camping.elliott@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> 8 gauge wire has the ampacity to handle 20A. It's rated for 23A carrying >>> current, and fuses (melts, pretty much) at 472 amps. Chart here: >>> >>> http://www.interfacebus.com/Copper_Wire_AWG_SIze.html >>> >>> An 8 foot run of 8 gauge wire will have .005 ohm of resistance. At 20 >>> amps >>> this will result in 0.1 volt less voltage getting to your lamps. Not >>> noticeable. >>> >>> So, 8 gauge can handle the job without getting hot 20 amps over 8 feet >>> will result in only 2 watts of heating. >>> >> >> >> >> Ok, now I feel foolish. >> >> Are the wiring charts I just emailed to Don/list (shown below) >> incorrect, or am I just using them incorrectly? >> >> Bowing and deferring to the truly electrically knowledgeable, >> >> Neil. >> >> >> >> Neil wrote: >> >> >> This one shows #8 good to 150 amps: >> >> http://www.rowand.net/Shop/Tech/WireCapacityChart.htm >> >> This chart shows how ampicity of a wire decreases as length increases >> >> http://www.offroaders.com/tech/12-volt-wire-gauge-amps.htm >> >> It shows #8 wire is good up to 150 amps BUT that's up to max. 10' run >> (round trip) >> >> >> >> >>


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.