Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 2009, week 1)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 2 Sep 2009 21:22:47 -0500
Reply-To:     John Rodgers <inua@CHARTER.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         John Rodgers <inua@CHARTER.NET>
Subject:      Re: vanagon difficulty
Comments: To: mcneely4@COX.NET
In-Reply-To:  <21659742.6024.1251935369585.JavaMail.mcneely4@127.0.0.1>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed

Actually, I consider the Vanagon to be one of the easier if not the easiest vehicle ot it's type - a van - to work on. Having some appropriate equipment makes it a snap.I have gone completely through one van - my first - which was an '85 GL, and currently almost done with going through my current one - an 88 GL. With a fairly standard tool box you can do one heck of a lot of work on these machines yourself, if you are spry enough, and when you pass that stage in life - you cans show a decent mechanic what to do and still get it done right. BTDT. I have another 88 GL waiting in the wings for the same treatment, and I have no fear of it either. If one wants to talk of problematic vehicles for maintenance - consider the frontwheel drive machines and what you have to do to them ot change out a CV, or R&R a transmission. What a nightmare. On many you almost have to pull the engine out to do that kind of work. Vanagons are really simple by comparison, and even on a bad hair day, they aren't bad.

Regards,

John Rodgers 88 GL Driver

Dave Mcneely wrote: > David Beierl asked what is it about vanagons that makes me consider them > difficult. Here: > > The are unreliable. Given their age, that is expected, but they NEVER > were as reliable as Japanese vehicles, which in my experience seldom > need repair. > > People who can (or are willing) to work on them are rare, especially in > the middle of the country. General shops can handle most vehicles. > Take a vanagon to one, and if the shop accepts it, the repair will > likely be done wrong. > > Diagnosis seems more difficult than with other vehicles, even for > knowledgeable techs. > > Parts are hard to get and inordinately expensive. > > A NON-difficult vehicle is one that seldom breaks, and when it does, can > be easily repaired at a wide variety of shops at reasonable cost. > That's not a vanagon. > > '91 Vanagon GL Campmobile, which I love for its utility in camping and > cross country travel, but fear will leave me stranded far from home or > help. > > Dave Mc > >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.