Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:29:37 -0700
Reply-To: Jake de Villiers <crescentbeachguitar@GMAIL.COM>
Sender: Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From: Jake de Villiers <crescentbeachguitar@GMAIL.COM>
Subject: Re: Merffler options?
In-Reply-To: <6bc66ccf0909170719t5d1a5085hdba6cefeefc9b186@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Did I mistakenly surf to the 'Republican List'?
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 7:19 AM, Don Hanson <dhanson928@gmail.com> wrote:
> It seems to me that Big Business is already working on getting the
> Government to make it difficult/expensive to keep our cars for this "longer
> time" you mention. And we, the vehicle owners, just go "Oh well, it's the
> law". They (California leads the way, the other states follow) seem to be
> trending towards changing rules now without providing for any
> 'grandfathering' of vehicles built before the new rule...They've begun
> laying the financial burden of getting a "variance" to a recent new rule
> right on the owners of older vehicles..
> So even though we'd LIKE to keep an effective, paid-for, good running
> vehicle with plenty of useful potential miles left in it, it becomes
> easier/less expensive to "junk it" and go buy a new, "better" one that
> complies with all the newest rules. Good for the auto industry and good
> for
> the politicians they've paid to pass the rules. ..not so good for us.
> Midas' Lifetime Warrantee probably would only have to last half a dozen
> years from now...then the vehicle with the Midas muffler will become
> legally "inconvenient" to keep on the road because it won't "comply" with
> the newest rules any longer.
> Don Hanson
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 6:45 AM, Dave Mcneely <mcneely4@cox.net> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 9:39 PM , Dennis Haynes wrote:
> >
> > The Midas lifetime warranty is a bit of a "come on"
> >>
> >
> > We all recognize that the business premises of "life time" warranty,
> > whether Midas or anyone else, is that most folks will (1) lose the
> > paperwork, (2) sell the vehicle (these warranties always say "to the
> > original purchaser"), or (3) just forget. I was told at a tire shop
> > that offers a free replacement road hazard warranty that they are able
> > to do that because they simply get almost no claims. It's not that
> > tires don't fail due to damage, but that most folks even forget the
> > warranty exists, or the vehicle the tires are on gets sold. Wonder how
> > that is going to play out with the much longer times that folks are
> > keeping cars (according to national data, not just my perception).
> >
> > On the other hand, my brother bought tires from that company, and has
> > now had two replacement tires because he drives on rough roads.
> >
> > But, if one enforces the warranty, will Midas weasel? Wouldn't seem to
> > make business sense.
> >
>
--
Jake
1984 Vanagon GL
1986 Westy Weekender "Dixie"
Crescent Beach, BC
www.thebassspa.com
www.crescentbeachguitar.com
http://subyjake.googlepages.com/mydixiedarlin%27
|