Date:         Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:10:52 -0700
Reply-To:     BenT Syncro <syncro@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         BenT Syncro <syncro@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Moderator CommentRe: Volkswagen - Audi - Porsche' training tapes
Comments: To: walkingboss <walkingboss@COMMUNICOMM.COM>
Comments: cc: David Beierl <dbeierl@attglobal.net>
In-Reply-To:  <70E64461AD2E4E048C5BCA25E0E5D7F9@MAINFRAME>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes

For the record there is no List prohibition regarding to use of name
brands and/or trademarks unless such use is on conflict with the
intellectual and financial rights of the trademark/brand owner,
Victorian or otherwise. ;-)


BenT

Sent from my headgasket

On Sep 21, 2009, at 6:46 PM, walkingboss <walkingboss@COMMUNICOMM.COM>
wrote:

>   You'll have to forgive my feeble attempt to follow list rules. I
> have
> been severely chastised before for using that "E" name on the list!
>   I never knew Queen Victoria so I can't speak to that. You just can't
> please some folks!
>
> Howard
>
>
>> Subject: Re: Volkswagen - Audi - Porsche' training tapes
>
>
>> Why can't people just say ebay instead of "e-place" and walmart
>> instead of W**mart and other ridiculous cryptic euphemisms like that?
>>
>> Snipped from thread < as I have them on "that E-place" also.>
>>
>> Is it a superstition? Is there something about the Vanagon list that
>> precludes the use of registered tradenames in common discussion
>> that I
>> don't know about?
>>
>> This has all gotten very Victorian lately.
>>
>> Jim