On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Tobin Copley <tcopley@sfu.ca> wrote: > A bicycle satisfies points B and C just fine. And given that most trips are just a few miles or less, a bicycle serves the purpose just fine. And yes, a bike is just fine in the rain and down to 15 below or so. And arguably better in many snow conditions than a car. > > Bike more, drive less? That oughta help, right? > No doubt - any of my three bicycles cost less to operate and pollute the planet less than my Vanagon or full-size Toyota Tundra pickup. If your goal is to live efficiently, walk or ride when you can and drive when you must. In the context of motor vehicle life-cycle emissions and operating cost, I stand by my assertions. -- Michael Snow 1982 Westfalia 1.9TD http://slowmachine82.blogspot.com/ |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.