Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (October 2009, week 1)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 2 Oct 2009 12:18:49 -0700
Reply-To:     David Kao <dtkao0205@YAHOO.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         David Kao <dtkao0205@YAHOO.COM>
Subject:      Re: California catalytic converter needed
In-Reply-To:  <001f01ca4390$4c342d80$e49c8880$@com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

I had an aftermarket CAT installed on my 84 GL about 8 years ago. It was a cheapo. I wasn't too happy about its look. But liked the price (less than $100). So far it never failed any SMOG test. I am in the Bay Area. I have no idea what it is all about California CAT. My cheapo CAT has been amazingly great. I can speed up my GL up to 80 MPH on the freeway if there is no head wind. The CAT is as good, if not better, than the OEM one.

Unfortunately I don't know where my mechanic (my cousin) got it from. I don't know what brand it is. My cousin apparently did not make profit from it. He only ordered it for me. I installed it myself. I don't anticipate it will go bad any time soon.

David

--- On Fri, 10/2/09, Robert Fisher <refisher@MCHSI.COM> wrote:

> From: Robert Fisher <refisher@MCHSI.COM> > Subject: Re: California catalytic converter needed > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Date: Friday, October 2, 2009, 11:43 AM > --snip-- > I can find nobody who understands the new CA BAR > rules.  Evidently there is > no information about why the old OEM model CAT is no longer > acceptable, or > why it's performance is not as good as these new ones that > are required. > --snip-- > > Local smog guy says: There were no specific regulations or > specs for the > cats, so aftermarket manufacturers were skimping so badly > on the necessary > ingredients that the cats would only last a short while, > basically requiring > the replacement of same every or every other smog check; > Also, people were > using new cats as a short-term band-aid to hide fundamental > running issues > that would cause the vehicle to fail. The conclusion here > was that this was > both a rip-off of the customer and an end run on the intent > of the smog > program. Apparently they now require replacement cats to be > much closer to > OEM specs, hence the cost. Look for this to become a trend > nationally > throughout the jurisdictions that require smog checks. > > Cya, > Robert >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.