Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:45:28 -0500
Reply-To: David Beierl <dbeierl@ATTGLOBAL.NET>
Sender: Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From: David Beierl <dbeierl@ATTGLOBAL.NET>
Subject: Re: Risk Management was Re: Any Suggestions for 24-hour
In-Reply-To: <21496651.70558.1258124353459.JavaMail.mcneely4@127.0.0.1>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
At 09:59 AM 11/13/2009, mcneely4@cox.net wrote:
>that some of them will be drunk or dead tired. That said, I
>personally feel a responsibility to others not to be drunk or dead
>tired, because the father I may kill has responsibilities, too
>(substitute whatever family member you wish). Have I driven while
>dead tired? Yes. Did I have a choice? Yes. Have I grown up
>enough to know better and not do it now? Yes.
>
>David
Dear David,
Yes. It's a very complicated issue and I try to have a nuanced view
of it. That sort of antinomy comes home to roost every time I drive
the van, because I know very well that in a frontal collision I'm
really remarkably safe -- but it's very much at the expense of the
other vehicle. Unlike the bus, which is by my standards way too soft
in front, the Vanagon has about a three-inch-deep heavy steel crush
bar (the "real" bumper) and then does its level best to impersonate a
block of stone, reflecting maximum crash energy back into the opposing vehicle.
http://www.vanagon.com/info/safety/volvo-crash/index.html
This: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ukq-UUQAcZs&feature=related
should be ignored -- this was not a test of the van but rather of the
barrier itself (notice no index markings on the vehicle) and the van
was both heavily loaded and driven at a speed to release about twenty
times the energy of a more typical crash.
But look at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pityxv0DW7M&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iwa9vdq8dvw&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGKlWqSadlQ&feature=related
Together they make up a film about 20 minutes long.
Point being that I have along with everyone else on this list made a
choice (just as many SUV drivers have, or at least *think* they have)
to drive a vehicle with a configuration that I like extremely well,
but inherently requires that my safety in a crash may be bought at
the expense of someone elses safety. I find that extremely sobering
and try to remember it often. And it *is* a choice -- the lack of
this protection in a bus is one of the major reasons why I'm not very
interested in having one.
Yours,
David
Yours,
David
| 
