Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (December 2009, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sat, 12 Dec 2009 14:16:40 -0800
Reply-To:     Don Hanson <dhanson928@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Don Hanson <dhanson928@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: About coolant
Comments: To: Jim Arnott <jrasite@eoni.com>
In-Reply-To:  <0E64F895-A8D3-417C-AEB4-9622E48639A2@eoni.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Well there we are...some actual definitave numbers from a 'scientist' or an engineer. For those of you who are not comfortable with 'anecdotal' evidence, gathered in an informal manner, coming from laymen.. 14% (+/-) would be appx. how much cooler my power-sports stuff seems to operate on Water and Redline Water wetter than it does on anti-freeze mix. Whenever I am faced with a problem or a situation where I am 'skating on thin ice' with the performance parameters of some system, I simply look around at others using similar systems, ask em how they make it work right, and then emulate what's working successfully for them...I don't need to know why, most of the time, or have actual test numbers before I accept and adopt a working solution...I just copy and move on to the next problematic thing... I'm very happy to have the Vanagon list so i don't have to solve all these 'long known' issues again for myself...I just ask or check the archives and move on.. Don Hanson On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Jim Arnott <jrasite@eoni.com> wrote:

> Short answer: yes. Water transfer heat better than glycol. > > Longer answer: When I worked in aerospace about a century ago, one of > my first assignments was process control for the heat treat area. We > solution heat treated a bunch of aluminum. (Solution heat treat: < > http://www.azom.com/Details.asp?ArticleID=2540 > > This was done to soften the material for forming. To reduce > residual stress, we used a quenchant of 20% polyalkalene glycol. This > provided a slower quench than water. Quenching in water would have > resulted in much more residual stress and distortion. Slower quench = > slower heat transfer. > > Numbers here: > http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/ethylene-glycol-d_146.html > > http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/overall-heat-transfer-coefficients-d_284.html > > Water is about 14% more efficient at 220 deg F. > > Jim >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.